Seemingly everybody to the right of Jon Huntsman has been invited to speak at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference — including formerly moderate Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R). There's one name, though, that's conspicuously absent on the list of invitees: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R). CPAC spokeswoman Laura Rigas says that, officially, the conference "schedule is still being finalized, with several more announcements pending over the next three weeks." But multiple news organizations are reporting that Christie won't make the list.
There are plenty of reasons conservatives might want to hear from a wildly popular Republican governor of a blue state, as Christie's fans were quick to point out:
CPAC won't invite America's most popular Republican elected official to speak. Way to rebuild a majority, guys. abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics…— Josh Barro (@jbarro) February 26, 2013
Chris Christie's 2012 speech at CPAC Chicago brought the house down is.gd/9wcn6y— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) February 26, 2013
Christie not invited to CPAC, a gathering for a Republican party that loves to lose elections! abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics…— David Podhaskie (@davidpodhaskie) February 26, 2013
So why the snub? Conservatives have a snap answer: Christie gave up his right to the conservative label during Hurricane Sandy, first by complimenting President Obama's handling of the super storm and then for blasting House Republicans for failing to initially approve funds to clean up from the disaster.
Well duh... he backed Obama at the last minute of the election. Freakin traitor!!! fb.me/1z74WaKGj— The American Patriot (@splooshman) February 26, 2013
That's a pretty big reversal for a politician whom Republicans begged to run for president, then vice president, in 2012, and is considered a strong contender in 2016. So this is "revenge because a GOPer dared to say something nice about President Barack Obama?" asks Joe Gandelman at The Moderate Voice.
It certainly sounds that way — and this very pointed, clearly intentional, most assuredly let's-send-'em-a-message snub of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie also suggests what could be in store if former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush decides to run and doesn't embrace the conservative agenda 100 percent or shows signs he'd be willing to reach across the aisle and not be on the partisan warpath 24/7.... Wasn't there supposed to be some kind of "rebranding" going on? [Moderate Voice]
"I have my issues with him just like you do, but c'mon," says Allahpundit at Hot Air. Christie may not be as conservative as Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas), but "he's one of the few members of the party with a national profile who's reasonably well liked by voters across the board. Leverage his popularity, if only for a day." Still, of all the moderates and RINOs upset by the Christie snub, the New Jersey governor probably isn't among them.
All they're doing here, whether they realize it or not, is throwing him into the briar patch. Christie was never going to run as the conservative choice in 2016 and lord knows he's not going to run as a conservative to get reelected in New Jersey.... CPAC's unwittingly helping him burnish his brand as the country's most formidable centrist Republican. Expect him to gets lots of mileage out of it in interviews over the next month. [Hot Air]
There are some other theories on CPAC's sidelining of Christie, some verging on the conspiratorial:
Excluding Chris Christie from CPAC reveals the character of the extreme right. They care more about making money and stirring resentment.— Joe Scarborough (@JoeNBC) February 26, 2013
That Christie has a 74% approval rating and that conservatives are mad at him are closely related. What conservatives want is unpopular.— Josh Barro (@jbarro) February 26, 2013
@politics_pr Mitt is angry with Christie. CPAC wants Mitt, the man that single-handedly made the GOP a laughing stock. So much for CPAC— Silverbear Heart (@SilverbearHeart) February 26, 2013
While CPAC may be burnishing Christie's luster among Democrats, some Democratic groups are attempting to do the opposite. On the same day the CPAC snub hit the wires, EMILY's List — a group that supports mostly pro–abortion-rights Democrats — started its campaign to sink Christie's heavily favored bid for re-election in November: Christie "has national ambitions and a relentlessly anti-woman, anti-family record, a dangerous combination that means we have to expose his extremism now, and prevent him from trying to take his regressive agenda nationwide."
At least EMILY'S List makes a solid conservative case for Chris Christie tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/02/chris-…— Nathan Wurtzel (@NathanWurtzel) February 25, 2013
Not a bad day if ur Christie “@jonward11: so in same day Chris Christie was attacked by Emily's List and reported to be not invited to CPAC”— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) February 26, 2013
Even if he's re-elected in New Jersey, though, the CPAC snub could hurt his chances with GOP primary voters in 2016, if Christie decides to run for president. Still, if that doesn't work out, his brand of tough-talk and yelling at audiences is suited to more than just being governor of the Garden State.
My solution to CPAC not inviting Christie to speak this year -- have the Academy ask him to host the Oscars in 2014. #killingtwobirds— Daniel Drezner (@dandrezner) February 26, 2013
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Why Pakistan won't hunt down the terrorists within its borders
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Pope Francis' American problem
- A brief history of the Christmas present
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Sorry, GOP, tax cuts don't pay for themselves
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
Subscribe to the Week