he good news for Congress is that if both houses pass a budget deal by Friday, they get to go home for Christmas break with no high-stakes fiscal grudge match awaiting them when they get back. And the prospects for passing a budget deal being hammered out by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), maybe even without the histrionics of recent years, seem to be pretty good.
The contours of the deal are emerging in news reports, but the details are being closely held by Murray and Ryan and their teams. The two legislators head up the 29-member House-Senate conference committee set up by the deal that ended October's government shutdown, but they are widely expected to bypass the committee and bring the package directly to the floor of their respective chambers for a vote.
The deal reportedly proposes to authorize about $1.015 trillion in discretionary funding, more than the $967 billion sought by Republicans — the amount specified in the budget-slicing sequestration that kicked in earlier this year — and less than the $1.058 trillion sought by Democrats. Spitting the difference — so far, so good.
But other than partially reversing the sequestration, Democrats don't appear to be getting much in the package. Last week, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other Democrats suggested they may not support a deal that doesn't extend benefits for the long-term unemployed; 1.3 million people will lose those benefits if Congress lets them lapse on December 28. On Sunday, Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said that isn't something Democrats will scuttle a deal over, meaning it will probably be taken up in separate legislation where Democrats have less leverage.
Democrats will probably also have to swallow an increase in the amount that federal employees have to contribute to their pensions — a provision especially anathema to Maryland's powerful Democratic delegation. Because Democrats will almost certainly be needed to pass the bill through the House, the increase will be much smaller than the 5.5 percent hike being pushed by Republicans.
"At the Democratic caucus meetings this last week in the House, there was in some senior places some great agita about the process and about the reports of the substance coming out of that process like I haven't seen in a long time," Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) tells Politico.
What are the Republicans giving up? A little bit of deficit-reduction, primarily — though a hefty chunk of the increased spending will be used to ease $19 billion in Defense Department cuts scheduled to kick in come January. Most Republicans would like to avoid those cuts. Some Republicans will also oppose whatever mechanism Ryan and Murray come up with to offset the cost of partially repealing the sequestration — raising airline users fees is one safe bet.
But that's the main reason Republicans are the net winners in this modest budget deal: Austerity is the default, the sequester is still the law of the land, and any attempts to undo this earlier budget miscalculation — remember, sequestration was supposed to be a budgetary cudgel so brutal it would force Congress to make a long-term deal — have to be paid for. This is, at least in the Obama years, Republican turf. Democrats want the sequester repealed entirely.
Republicans also gain from what's not in the emerging deal: There's no raising of the debt ceiling and, equally important, it erases the risk of another government shutdown anytime soon. Congress is deeply, deeply unpopular, and Republicans are still more unpopular than Democrats, in large part because they're seen as obstructionist. A budget deal without any big Tea Party theatrics would be a welcome change for GOP leaders concerned with portraying the party as ready to govern.
"That this can be declared a victory is an indicator of how low the process has sunk," says Robert Bixby of the bipartisan, deficit-focused Concord Coalition. "They haven't really done anything except avoid another crisis." Urban Institute budget expert Gene Steuerle agrees: "With this little package, we're not going to climb out of the hole we've dug," he says. "All we're doing is agreeing to stop throwing shovels at each other."
Score one for the GOP.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why are so many elderly Asians killing themselves?
- Why I'm sick and tired of seeing naked women on HBO
- Why ABC threw its Bachelor under the bus
- Here's how Iran is covering Russia's invasion of Crimea
- Why Ted Cruz is the real-life Frank Underwood
- Watch Zach Galifianakis get annoyed at President Obama on Between Two Ferns
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 4 easy ways to resolve life's toughest questions
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
Subscribe to the Week