The left's demonization of gun owners has gotten out of hand
There are plenty of intellectually coherent reasons to oppose gun control. Liberals must stop pretending otherwise
 
Every once in awhile, someone I admire says or writes something so outrageous that I am compelled to come to the defense of a person of whom I am not fond, or a position which I do not share.
David Rothkopf runs Foreign Policy — far and away the best foreign affairs website on the internet, as well as a very solid magazine. On Tuesday, however, Rothkopf opted to demonize Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell as more dangerous than Kim Jong Un, who — despite looking like a sketch-comedy dictator — is a ruthless leader who presides over a starving, terrified population.
Rothkopf's argument (you can read the whole thing here) is simple enough: Kim Jong Un may be a lunatic, but he is a lunatic highly unlikely to inflict damage on the United States. So Rothkopf suggests that we turn our attention to a supposed villain who he thinks is more worthy of our immediate attention: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and his colleagues threatening to filibuster gun control.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
 
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Because Kim, even with his nuclear weapons, is hardly likely to launch an attack on Americans anywhere given that the response would produce the instant and certain obliteration of his regime. What that means is that for all his bluster, the chubby little autocrat is very unlikely to cost one American his life. But in vowing to block any vote on even the most modest legislation to rein in America's out-of-control gun culture, the Senate minority leader all but guarantees that the toll in America's street-corner war will continue to rise. [Foreign Policy]
This is uncharacteristically Rush Limbaugh-esque, and brings to mind the ridiculous comparisons circulated by certain members of the Tea Party who once likened Barack Obama's oratory skills to those of Adolf Hitler — as if one can invoke only part of Hitler's legacy as a point of comparison without the other parts of his murderous life entering into people's consciousness.
I actually agree with Rothkopf that blocking legislation is an irresponsible thing to do. However, as many on the left throughout this debate have been so eager to do, Rothkopf also builds in another layer of criticism which is, frankly, far more accusatory and far less constructive — let's call it the "blood on your hands" argument. In essence, Rothkopf suggests that those who oppose modest gun regulations will be responsible for future firearms-related deaths.
This unfairly and counter-productively distracts from Rothkopf's real and important argument, which is that even though a set of regulations will not in and of itself solve our nation's gun violence problem, lawmakers should still support modest changes that could yield some public safety benefits without meaningfully compromising law-abiding citizens' freedom to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes. That's a sound argument. That is an argument I agree with.
As I have repeatedly expressed on this website, I support modest gun control, including background checks and magazine capacity limits. I think that filibustering is morally questionable and politically idiotic, especially in light of the fact that meaningful regulation has a zero percent chance of passing the GOP-controlled House. But nevertheless, it takes an indefensible amount of hubris to presume absolutely — as Rothkopf and so many others in this debate seem to — that the arguments of gun owners are not worth taking seriously or are so crazy as to be worthy of association with a tyrant.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Make your argument, but do not disrespect the other side. They love and come from the same country you do.
Jeb Golinkin is an attorney from Houston, Texas. You can follow him on twitter @jgolinkin.
- 
 Should Labour break manifesto pledge and raise taxes? Should Labour break manifesto pledge and raise taxes?Today's Big Question There are ‘powerful’ fiscal arguments for an income tax rise but it could mean ‘game over’ for the government 
- 
 Nigerian Modernism: an ‘entrancing, enlightening exhibition’ Nigerian Modernism: an ‘entrancing, enlightening exhibition’The Week Recommends Tate Modern’s ‘revelatory’ show includes 250 works examining Nigerian art pre- and post independence 
- 
 To the point: the gender divide over exclamation marks To the point: the gender divide over exclamation marksTalking Point 'Men harbouring urges to be more exclamative' can finally take a breath – this is what using the punctuation really conveys 
- 
 Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June 
- 
 Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein 
- 
 The last words and final moments of 40 presidents The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't 
- 
 The JFK files: the truth at last? The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration 
- 
 'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump? 'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred 
- 
 Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off? Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook 
- 
 Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing? Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration 
- 
 US election: where things stand with one week to go US election: where things stand with one week to goThe Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'