Why Jeb Bush (hopefully) can't just buy the Republican nomination
It may sound naive, but there's more to politics than money
William F. Buckley famously said that, when it came to Republican primaries, he supported the most conservative candidate among the ones who were electable. If all conservatives hewed to that standard it would be bad news for Jeb Bush, since he is neither the most conservative nor the most electable GOP candidate.
It's worth rehashing the obvious: Given America's democratic ethos and his brother's record, Bush would be a bad GOP candidate in any election cycle. But he's particularly bad for the 2016 election cycle. First, because the Republican Party's number one political challenge is to shed its image (too often grounded in reality) as the party of rich people, for rich people, by rich people. Second, because he is the worst possible candidate in the field to run against Hillary Clinton, who like Bush is a political heir, a throwback to the past, and associated with a legacy of cynical political manipulation.
It must be said that Bush was a very successful governor of Florida. He is a policy wonk and a good manager, and has a talented mind. The world might be a very different place, perhaps much better, had Jeb won his first run for governor and George had lost, paving the way for Jeb to run for president in 2000. But in this world, it's a bad idea for Jeb Bush to run for president. It's not his fault, but it's the truth.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
All of which makes the news that Bush handily beat fundraising records — with $114 million in the bank before the party has really even begun — all the more depressing.
Don't donors have just a bit of political sense? Surely they must understand why a Bush candidacy would be bad for the GOP. Don't rich people usually want to back winning horses? Or is the Bush network so impressive that it can round up $114 million in pity money and party favors?
We are told that Team Bush intended to "shock and awe" his rivals and potential rivals into submission. Suffice it to say it hasn't worked. The Republican field is as crowded as ever, with a bench so deep that successful two-term governors of important states, such as Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, and Chris Christie, can be considered second tier. And why would "shock and awe" work when these candidates are as aware of Bush's weaknesses as anybody else?
Now, there's the myth of the GOP as a party run by insiders, money men, and the dark powers of the Establishment (always a capital E), who always get the candidate they want in the end. The GOP might have its rebels and its populists and its Tea Party types, but ultimately it's McCain and Romney who get the nod, not Huckabee or Santorum. "Democrats love to fall in love, Republicans love to fall in line," goes the proverb.
All of this creates the impression — one that certainly prevails in the Bush camp — that whatever his flaws, Bush can make it to the finish line as long as he can raise enough money, accumulate enough Establishment support, and be a good enough candidate. He may be bruised by the primary; he may tarnish the GOP brand in a fusillade of negative advertising; he may be forced to move to the right — but he'll make it across the finish line.
As a conservative who wishes the GOP well, I can only say: I hope that's not true.
I don't think it's true, either. I think that people are actual human beings who make their own decisions, no matter how many negative ads Bush deploys. I think that the Establishment candidate tends to win because many Republicans factor electability highly in their choice — which in this case won't help Bush.
Still, $114 million is a lot of money, and there's a lot more where that came from. So here's to hoping money can't buy you a Republican nomination.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry is a writer and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His writing has appeared at Forbes, The Atlantic, First Things, Commentary Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Federalist, Quartz, and other places. He lives in Paris with his beloved wife and daughter.
-
What to know when planning an awe-inspiring hike on the Inca Trail
The Week Recommends Peru's most famous trail leads to Machu Picchu
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Lead poisoning remains a threat
The Explainer The toxin is built into our lives
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Should you use a 529 plan? What to know about this college savings option.
The Explainer This tax-advantaged savings account can be used to pay tuition or buy textbooks
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published