America needs a Sanders-Trump-Bloomberg-Johnson race
Voters are sick of establishment politics. Why not have a presidential race that really represents everyone's views?
As a finicky libertarian who is too much of a purist to back any of the major party candidates and too much of a pragmatist to vote third party, I have no dog in this 2016 presidential fight. But I do have the hope of a legitimately interesting general election — and specifically, the slight but tantalizing possibility of a four-man race.
The ideal line-up: Bernie Sanders (D) vs. Donald Trump (R) vs. Mike Bloomberg (I) vs. Gary Johnson (L).
This foursome would give us more interesting general election debates than we've seen in years, featuring, respectively, representatives of the socialist left, nationalist right, statist center, and cosmopolitan libertarianism.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On the debate stage, pairings and contrasts would emerge on an issue-by-issue basis: Raise taxes? Sanders and Bloomberg. Mass surveillance on ordinary Muslims? Bloomberg and Trump. Reduced American presence in the Middle East? Sanders and Johnson. Abolish the Department of Education? Johnson and Trump. Restrict immigration to help American workers? Trump and Sanders (yes, really).
Here's how we get there in four steps.
First, Trump and Sanders must snag their nominations — hardly an impossibility at this point. Trump retains a substantial national lead, and seven in ten Republicans believe he'll win the nomination.
Sanders recently surpassed Hillary Clinton in national support for the first time, and some polls suggest he's Democrats' stronger option against Trump. Whether he'll be able to maintain momentum in the South remains to be seen — Clinton currently outpaces him two-to-one in South Carolina — but his campaign is far from the longshot it once seemed.
Second, Bloomberg must get in the race as an independent candidate. This step is comparatively easy, as he has already indicated an interest in running. Bloomberg seems most likely to jump in if Sanders is nominated, and indeed polling indicates he performs better against Sanders than Clinton, as he can more easily pick off centrist Democrats. Bloomberg's high-profile gun control advocacy could also drive Democrats his way if Sanders, who has a notably mixed record on guns, is the alternative.
Now, to be fair, this is not the first time Bloomberg has toyed with the idea of a presidential run. But it's not Trump's first time either, so maybe this is the year of New York billionaires finally going through with their campaign fantasies.
For the third step, we return to Republican voters, now stuck between two rocks and a very hard place. From their own party, on offer is a candidate who "just about runs the table on the seven deadly sins;" is fiercely opposed by respected religious and political conservatives; and has embraced positions anathema to the average Republican, like funding Planned Parenthood and the ObamaCare individual mandate. That a third of Republicans support Trump means two out of three prefer someone else — in fact, despite his impressive showing on Tuesday night, he is second only to Jeb Bush in unfavorability among GOP voters.
But what's the alternative? A self-identified socialist in Sanders and a gun control advocate and all-around nanny statist in Bloomberg. That's where Johnson comes in.
For some Republicans desperate for a palatable vote in 2016, former (Republican) New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson could fit the bill. He's never been my preferred libertarian candidate, but the very reasons I critique him (primarily, a semi-interventionist foreign policy including belligerence toward Iran, willingness to launch humanitarian missions and drone strikes, and paranoia about Muslims) probably make him more appealing to some in the GOP.
True, Johnson, now CEO of a Nevada-based company that actually sells cannabis, is more enthusiastic about marijuana than conservatives might like under normal circumstances, but remember the alternatives. (Actually, by November, Republicans may be feeling the need to become Johnson customers as well as voters.) And anyway, when it comes to weed, the times are changing. Two in three Republicans favor marijuana reform, so that — plus Johnson's other socially liberal views — could well be an acceptable price to pay for his strict fiscal conservatism backed by a strong record as governor, where he left his state government substantially smaller and running a $1 billion surplus.
Fourth and finally, though the general election debate stage has held only Democrats and Republicans since Ross Perot's run in 1992, this time around, additional participants are not inconceivable. The minimum requirement is 15 percent support in national polls, and with major party picks as polarizing as Trump and Sanders, Bloomberg and Johnson could meet that mark.
In fact, the leaders of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) said in January that they could see exactly such a dynamic. "The dynamic in the electorate right now and the dissatisfaction with the two major political parties could very conceivably allow an independent or a third-party candidate to emerge," commented CPD co-chair Michael McCurry, "and we are very clear that they would be welcome in these debates."
Any other year, 15 percent would be an almost unattainable benchmark for an independent or Libertarian Party candidate to hit before having the exposure of the debates. This time, though, it could happen — and it should. A Sanders-Trump-Bloomberg-Johnson race is the election America deserves, a thorough upending of establishment politics and a true exercise in political diversity.
Yeah, Trump would probably win. But that might happen anyway. Let's at least have a good conversation on the way.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Bonnie Kristian was a deputy editor and acting editor-in-chief of TheWeek.com. She is a columnist at Christianity Today and author of Untrustworthy: The Knowledge Crisis Breaking Our Brains, Polluting Our Politics, and Corrupting Christian Community (forthcoming 2022) and A Flexible Faith: Rethinking What It Means to Follow Jesus Today (2018). Her writing has also appeared at Time Magazine, CNN, USA Today, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, and The American Conservative, among other outlets.
-
Outer Hebrides: a top travel destination
The Week Recommends Discover 'unspoiled beauty' of the Western Isles
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
The Biltmore Mayfair review: a quintessential slice of luxury London
The Week Recommends This swanky retreat in Grosvenor Square blends old-world glamour with modern comforts
By Caroline Dolby Published
-
Is ChatGPT's new search engine OpenAI's Google 'killer'?
Talking Point There's a new AI-backed search engine in town. But can it stand up to Google's decades-long hold on internet searches?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published