How Republicans got their big government groove back
If it's enforcing things like gendered bathrooms, conservatives seem happy with government coercion
If there's one thing the fragmented Republican Party can still agree on, it's that government coercion is extremely bad. The whole conservative brand is about having the freedom to live one's life without being bothered by lots of pesky meddlesome bureaucrats.
It's an appealing notion. But it's also fiction. Conservatives, like all political tribes, are big fans of government coercion when it produces results they like. A decade ago, their favorite coercive policy was gay marriage bans, which they pushed with remarkable, though temporary, success. Now that battle has been lost, and the bleeding edge of civil liberties expansions has moved to transgender rights. Conservatives have responded as usual with coercive government policy.
I'm referring, of course, to the recent North Carolina state law mandating that all schools and public agencies have gender-segregated bathrooms, banning transgender people from using the bathroom of their gender identity, and preempting several local anti-discrimination statutes which included transgender people as a protected class. Seven other states are considering similar laws.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The motivation here is obvious enough: Conservatives think transgender people are deviant, and so they should be prevented from gaining social status and broad respect. Some of them, like Ben Shapiro and Ted Cruz, seem obsessed with the prospect of "large men" peeing in the same room as girls to a frankly rather unhealthy degree (though of course such a description is itself wrong and transphobic). Nothing so surprising about that. Birds fly, cows go moo, and conservative politicians are weird about sex and gender.
But it's also a revealing instance of how conservatives actually use the state when they have the run of it.
Typically the conservative policy frame is at least nominally organized around "negative liberty," the idea that everyone should be left to their own devices as much as possible. Taxes should be low, regulations should be few, and nobody should be "forced" to do anything to which they don't freely agree.
One would think that for such a politics, the status of personal characteristics like gender ought to be given at least a respectful hearing. But no, conservatives reacted to the transgender movement with fear and disgust, and ran to the state to give their narrow vision of Approved Society the stamp of law.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
So long as they are in charge, Republicans are happy to mobilize the police to enforce their ideas about which individuals should be using which bathroom. Only in a few years, when the tide begins to flow the other way, will they start moaning piteously about their own tribe being forced to accommodate transgender people.
At any rate, it seems virtually inevitable that transgender people, like gays before them, will eventually win their struggle for rights and recognition, and conservatives will be left with yet another culture war loss to stew about. I'd even guess that the whole idea of gendered bathrooms will go the way of the dinosaurs in about 10 to 15 years. A couple decades after that, conservative writers will pen goofy revisionist histories about how actually, liberals were the enemies of transgender rights. They could skip to the end of this process, and just let transgender people peacefully join society, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Dead Man Walking: searing contemporary opera is a ‘triumph’The Week Recommends Death row drama ‘deals with the very essence of morality, judgement and conscience’
-
Kenny Dalglish: a ‘warm and gusty’ documentaryThe Week Recommends A riveting portrait of a Liverpool FC legend
-
The Southern Ocean is holding in a 'burp'Under the radar The heat from the past can affect the future
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
