The Trump voters who already regret voting for Trump
Regrets? They've had a few.

By now you've seen innumerable stories in the news media in which the reporter visits a hardscrabble town that went heavily for Donald Trump in 2016 — maybe in West Virginia or Ohio or Michigan — and finds that despite the president's troubles, hard-core Trump supporters in their "Make America Great Again" hats are still behind him.
I don't want to talk about those people.
Instead, let's talk about a different set of voters: people I'll call the "What the hell" Trump supporters. It's hard to know exactly how many of them there are, because it's a category not usually captured in polls. But from anecdotes, we can be fairly sure that they were plentiful. They weren't stars-in-their-eyes Trump fans, and they weren't necessarily super-loyal Republicans. They were dissatisfied with the way things were going in the country and didn't think Washington was accomplishing anything. They realized Trump was something of a con man, but they said, "What the hell. Let's give him a shot and see if he can do any better." They didn't think they had much to lose. Maybe it really would make a difference to have a businessman in charge. Maybe he really could use his deal-making prowess to forge solutions to problems that had seemed intractable. Maybe he really could jawbone and bully other countries to give us our jobs back. These voters never thought Trump walked on water. But they decided to give him a chance anyway.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
And President Trump may already be losing them.
Consider a Gallup poll that came out on Monday. Among other things, it found ratings of Trump plunging on a variety of measures in the last two months, including whether he "keeps his promises." In February, 62 percent of people said he does; in April it was down to 45 percent. Among people describing themselves as political independents, he went from 59 percent down to 43 percent on that measure.
Maybe it was the failure of the GOP's Affordable Care Act repeal that did it, or maybe it was the general chaos and bumbling around the White House. And of course, maybe it's only temporary — he could bounce back the next time they take a poll. But if you were one of those "What the hell" voters, what you were looking for was results. And so far, you haven't gotten any.
Sure, there have been some executive orders and signatures on a few modest bills, on things like putting more coal ash into streams or attacking Planned Parenthood. But so far, Trump's presidency has hardly been a juggernaut of success.
A Republican might protest that we're only a few months into Trump's term, which is absolutely true. But if people aren't offering him a lot of patience, he has no one to blame but himself. Trump promised miracles: We'd build a wall on the southern border and Mexico would pay for it, all the coal jobs would come back, he'd smack the Chinese around and they'd give us all our manufacturing jobs back, he'd replace ObamaCare with "something terrific" that would offer fantastic coverage yet cost less, ISIS would be vanquished and the world would respect and admire the United States — or as he put it, "We're going to win so much. You're going to get tired of winning."
When you make promises that are so ridiculous they can't possibly be kept, before long people may decide you haven't kept them. And while a campaign is all about creating a compelling vision of the future, a president has to produce right here in the present. You can go to a factory and say you've saved a few dozen or a few hundred jobs, but eventually people will notice that the terrific high-wage jobs you promised them, in their communities, aren't materializing.
That brings us to another problem Trump will have over time. On the campaign trail, he described America as a post-apocalyptic hellscape where unemployment was at 42 percent, crime was at record highs, and we all lived in constant misery. The truth, however, was that unemployment was under 5 percent and crime was near all-time lows. That means that Trump doesn't have a lot of room to improve things, except in ways he's not likely to accomplish.
For instance, the problem isn't that there aren't enough jobs, because there are plenty of jobs. The problems are more complicated, revolving around slowing productivity gains, insufficient wage growth, and a skills gap for the kind of high-paying work that used to be found in factories even for people without a lot of formal education. The only people who think that you can solve those problems with the program Trump is pursuing — little more than tax cuts for the wealthy and the removal of environmental and worker safety regulations — are Republican congressmen who read Ayn Rand in high school and never got over it.
Trump may get much of that program passed in the end, but the chances that it will create all the winning he promised are between slim and none. And since his argument wasn't based on ideology or understanding of policy, he has to produce results. If you're one of those "What the hell" Trump voters, you may have already decided that you gave him his shot, and he blew it.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Has Starmer put Britain back on the world stage?
Talking Point UK takes leading role in Europe on Ukraine and Starmer praised as credible 'bridge' with the US under Trump
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why are more young people getting bowel cancer?
The Explainer Alarming rise in bowel-cancer diagnoses in under 50s is puzzling scientists
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Dream Count: Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's 'vibrant' new novel
The Week Recommends The Nigerian author's 'richly marbled' book makes the longlist for the 30th women's prize for fiction
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published