The grand failure of Trump's depraved hostage strategy
Holding innocent children as political hostages made millions of Trump's opponents sick. But they refused to bow to his demands.


America is being run not by a president, but a mafia boss whose preferred negotiation strategy is hostage taking.
Nothing illustrates this better than President Trump's handling of the immigration crisis that has resulted in the revolting spectacle of border patrol agents ripping wailing toddlers from the arms of migrant parents and putting them in cages until Trump's immigration demands are met. More than 2,000 children have been separated from their parents in just six weeks. If you have any lingering doubt about just how heartbreaking and monstrous this is, just listen to this audio of separated children obtained by ProPublica.
In some ways, we shouldn't be surprised. Trump ran the most blatantly nativist presidential campaign in modern American history. That, along with his combative style, virtually guaranteed that he would play hardball to push his ultra-restrictionist agenda through Congress.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Still, no one really imagined the lengths to which he would be prepared to go. But maybe we should have foreseen these tactics. We have long known that Trump loves to take hostages.
We saw it last fall when Trump first took the DREAMers (or people brought illegally to the U.S. as children) hostage. Trump unilaterally set a six-month ticking clock on the Obama-era DACA program, which handed a temporary reprieve from deportation to DREAMers, and threatened that he would deport them without congressional action by the time that clock expired.
In exchange for legalizing the DREAMers, the president demanded $25 billion for the Great Wall of Trump, mandatory E-verify for employers, and a 40 percent cut in legal family-based immigration. Oh, and he wanted to criminally prosecute those claiming asylum who filed "false" claims and lowered the bar for what counts as "false" so that the majority would land in a federal penitentiary rather than the safe haven they were seeking.
The courts spoiled Trump's ransom scheme by preventing him from ending DACA. So Trump moved on to taking little kids hostage to put pressure on Congress to capitulate to his hideous agenda. On Wednesday, he finally backed down and reluctantly promised to reverse his administration's family separation policy — but only after several days of relentless bipartisan — and even global — pressure.
Before he backed down, Trump tried to pin the blame for his border separation polices on "bad laws that Democrats gave us" that "require us to break up families." He repeated this claim many times. It was, and always has been, a lie. This was a practice of the Trump administration's own choosing. Without getting into all the legislative and procedural intricacies, the administration basically set up traps for asylum-seeking parents so that it could charge them like criminals and take away their kids.
Why do this? The administration's calculation in snatching kids is that it would make opponents so sick to their stomachs that they would do anything to procure their release. In some ways, it worked. Holding innocent children as political hostages did make millions of Trump's opponents sick. But where Trump miscalculated was in assuming that his detractors would then bow to his demands. Instead, they fought him publicly and ferociously. And he was the one who inevitably caved.
Supporters of Trump's policy argued that separating kids was necessary because their parents were using them as chips to gain entrance into the United States. But parents don't just pack up home and hearth and undertake a dangerous journey just for the heck of it. They were fleeing violence and trying to bring their kids to safety. In fact, it was the administration using these kids as bargaining chips to try and ramrod a draconian immigration agenda through Congress.
In holding children hostage, the Trump administration was counting on opponents' humanity while showing none itself. This is the logic of organized gangsters. It is a good thing that the country has returned from the moral brink. But it should never have gotten so close to the edge in the first place.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Shikha Dalmia is a visiting fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University studying the rise of populist authoritarianism. She is a Bloomberg View contributor and a columnist at the Washington Examiner, and she also writes regularly for The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and numerous other publications. She considers herself to be a progressive libertarian and an agnostic with Buddhist longings and a Sufi soul.
-
Colum McCann's 6 favorite books that take place at sea
Feature The National Book Award-winning author recommends works by Ernest Hemingway, Herman Melville, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Jewish communities are wary of Donald Trump’s push to punish antisemitism
IN THE SPOTLIGHT While the White House expands its effort to criminalize actions it deems harmful to Jewish Americans, not everyone in those same communities are on board with the president's purported assistance.
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Book Review: 'Yoko: A Biography' and 'Ghosts of Iron Mountain: The Hoax of the Century, Its Enduring Impact, and What It Reveals About America Today'
Feature The woman who shaped the Beatles and how the hoax of 'Report From Iron Mountain' fueled conspiracy theories
By The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published