Bipartisan group pitches 'chess clock'-style remodel of presidential debates

Presidential debate
(Image credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images)

This election cycle has seen a number of proposed changes to the format of the presidential debates, generally favoring longer response times and the inclusion of more candidates. Today, a bipartisan panel from the Annenberg Public Policy Center offered another recommendation to consider.

The report highlights declining debate viewership and proposes an overhaul of the timing format. One option detailed is the use of a "chess clock," in which each candidate is allotted equal speaking time that is counted by a ticking clock whenever he or she talks. This would significantly level the playing field among candidates; in the past, unequal time allotments have dramatically favored some contenders over others. For instance, in one 2011 debate, then-candidate Ron Paul was given just 89 seconds to talk.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
Explore More
Bonnie Kristian

Bonnie Kristian was a deputy editor and acting editor-in-chief of TheWeek.com. She is a columnist at Christianity Today and author of Untrustworthy: The Knowledge Crisis Breaking Our Brains, Polluting Our Politics, and Corrupting Christian Community (forthcoming 2022) and A Flexible Faith: Rethinking What It Means to Follow Jesus Today (2018). Her writing has also appeared at Time Magazine, CNN, USA Today, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, and The American Conservative, among other outlets.