What is the US citizenship question?
New team of government lawyers to take over US census cases following Supreme Court block
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The US Department of Justice has announced a shake-up of its team of lawyers handling 2020 census-related cases, amid an ongoing legal battle over a citizenship question that Donald Trump wants added to the upcoming national survey.
The move comes after the Supreme Court last month blocked an initial attempt by the president to alter the census forms to ask: “Is this person a citizen of the United States?”
Why is Trump pushing the new question?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In March 2018, the Justice Department said that the current level of census data is “insufficient in scope, detail and certainty” about the voting age population. The Trump administrations claims more information about eligible voters is needed to help enforce protections for minority voters under the federal Voting Rights Act, according to the Pew Research Center, a Washington D.C.-based think-tank.
The results of the census are used to apportion hundreds of billions of dollars for federal services such as education and policing, as well as allotting seats in the US House of Representatives.
“I think it’s totally ridiculous that we would have a census without asking,” Trump told reporters last month. “I think when the census goes out, you should find out whether or not - and you have the right to ask whether or not - somebody is a citizen of the United States.”
However, civil rights groups and some US states have objected to the proposal.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Campaigners claim the new question is a “Republican ploy to scare immigrants into not participating in the census”, leading to a population undercount in Democratic-leaning areas with a high number of immigrants, says The Guardian.
An estimated 22 million people living in the US are non-citizens.
Why was it rejected by the Supreme Court?
On 27 June, the Supreme Court effectively blocked the new question, rejecting the rationale behind its introduction.
The Justice Department initially appeared to accept this verdict but then said that it would continue to push for the change, before announcing this week that a new legal team would be tackling the issue.
On Friday, Trump told reporters: “We’re working on a lot of things, including an executive order.”
What happens next?
The president’s persistence has prompted George Hazel, a federal judge in Maryland, to move forward with a case that claims the administration intends to disciminate against immigrant communities of colour by adding the question, reports the National Public Radio (NPR) news site.
Earlier this year, it emerged that an unpublished 2015 study by the late GOP political strategist Thomas Hofeller argued that asking a citizenship question on the census would redraw Congressional districts in a way that “would be advantageous to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites”.
“Court filings show that some of Hofeller’s work on this issue made its way into the Justice Department’s citizenship request - some of it word-for-word. The Justice Department has denied the link,” says CNN.
Now, as the Trump administration “prolongs the legal fight to add a citizenship question to the census, more evidence may be revealed in court about how and exactly why the administration tried to include it”, adds NPR.
-
Why is Prince William in Saudi Arabia?Today’s Big Question Government requested royal visit to boost trade and ties with Middle East powerhouse, but critics balk at kingdom’s human rights record
-
Wuthering Heights: ‘wildly fun’ reinvention of the classic novel lacks depthTalking Point Emerald Fennell splits the critics with her sizzling spin on Emily Brontë’s gothic tale
-
Why the Bangladesh election is one to watchThe Explainer Opposition party has claimed the void left by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League but Islamist party could yet have a say
-
Trump links funding to name on Penn StationSpeed Read Trump “can restart the funding with a snap of his fingers,” a Schumer insider said
-
Trump reclassifies 50,000 federal jobs to ease firingsSpeed Read The rule strips longstanding job protections from federal workers
-
Is the Gaza peace plan destined to fail?Today’s Big Question Since the ceasefire agreement in October, the situation in Gaza is still ‘precarious’, with the path to peace facing ‘many obstacles’
-
Vietnam’s ‘balancing act’ with the US, China and EuropeIn the Spotlight Despite decades of ‘steadily improving relations’, Hanoi is still ‘deeply suspicious’ of the US as it tries to ‘diversify’ its options
-
Trump demands $1B from Harvard, deepening feudSpeed Read Trump has continually gone after the university during his second term
-
Trump’s Kennedy Center closure plan draws ireSpeed Read Trump said he will close the center for two years for ‘renovations’
-
Trump's ‘weaponization czar’ demoted at DOJSpeed Read Ed Martin lost his title as assistant attorney general
-
Gabbard faces questions on vote raid, secret complaintSpeed Read This comes as Trump has pushed Republicans to ‘take over’ voting