What is the US citizenship question?
New team of government lawyers to take over US census cases following Supreme Court block
The US Department of Justice has announced a shake-up of its team of lawyers handling 2020 census-related cases, amid an ongoing legal battle over a citizenship question that Donald Trump wants added to the upcoming national survey.
The move comes after the Supreme Court last month blocked an initial attempt by the president to alter the census forms to ask: “Is this person a citizen of the United States?”
Why is Trump pushing the new question?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In March 2018, the Justice Department said that the current level of census data is “insufficient in scope, detail and certainty” about the voting age population. The Trump administrations claims more information about eligible voters is needed to help enforce protections for minority voters under the federal Voting Rights Act, according to the Pew Research Center, a Washington D.C.-based think-tank.
The results of the census are used to apportion hundreds of billions of dollars for federal services such as education and policing, as well as allotting seats in the US House of Representatives.
“I think it’s totally ridiculous that we would have a census without asking,” Trump told reporters last month. “I think when the census goes out, you should find out whether or not - and you have the right to ask whether or not - somebody is a citizen of the United States.”
However, civil rights groups and some US states have objected to the proposal.
Campaigners claim the new question is a “Republican ploy to scare immigrants into not participating in the census”, leading to a population undercount in Democratic-leaning areas with a high number of immigrants, says The Guardian.
An estimated 22 million people living in the US are non-citizens.
Why was it rejected by the Supreme Court?
On 27 June, the Supreme Court effectively blocked the new question, rejecting the rationale behind its introduction.
The Justice Department initially appeared to accept this verdict but then said that it would continue to push for the change, before announcing this week that a new legal team would be tackling the issue.
On Friday, Trump told reporters: “We’re working on a lot of things, including an executive order.”
What happens next?
The president’s persistence has prompted George Hazel, a federal judge in Maryland, to move forward with a case that claims the administration intends to disciminate against immigrant communities of colour by adding the question, reports the National Public Radio (NPR) news site.
Earlier this year, it emerged that an unpublished 2015 study by the late GOP political strategist Thomas Hofeller argued that asking a citizenship question on the census would redraw Congressional districts in a way that “would be advantageous to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites”.
“Court filings show that some of Hofeller’s work on this issue made its way into the Justice Department’s citizenship request - some of it word-for-word. The Justice Department has denied the link,” says CNN.
Now, as the Trump administration “prolongs the legal fight to add a citizenship question to the census, more evidence may be revealed in court about how and exactly why the administration tried to include it”, adds NPR.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
A history of student protest at Columbia University
The Explainer Anti-Israel demonstrations at NYC's Ivy League university echo protests against Vietnam War and South African apartheid
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Trump is ruled in contempt'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Hainault sword attack: police hunt for motive
Speed Read Mental health is key line of inquiry, as detectives prepare to interview suspect
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
'Can we — the people who have bought so much already — really keep buying more?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Presidential debates are more performance art than actual ways to inform'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Trump, DeSantis meet for first time since primary
Speed Read The former president and the Florida governor have seemingly mended their rivalry
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Justices set to punt on Trump immunity case
Speed Read Conservative justices signaled support for Trump's protection from criminal charges
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Biden is smart to keep the border-security pressure on'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Arizona grand jury indicts 18 in Trump fake elector plot
Speed Read The state charged Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani and other Trump allies in 2020 election interference case
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Who will win the 2024 presidential election?
In Depth Election year is here. Who are pollsters and experts predicting to win the White House?
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published