An ally of Donald Trump has altered his testimony to the impeachment inquiry to confirm that the US president offered Ukraine a quid pro quo to investigate a political rival.
In a revision described by The Guardian as “dramatic”, Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the EU, said he told a senior official in Ukraine that nearly $400m in military aid would probably be withheld until the country announced an investigation into allegations about a gas company with ties to the former vice-president Joe Biden’s son Hunter.
The 375-page transcript of Sondland's 17 October deposition was released yesterday with an additional three-page declaration from Sondland, along with a letter from his attorney dated 4 November, at the end.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sondland originally told investigators there was never a quid pro quo attaching aid or a White House visit to investigations. However, after subsequent witness appearances, Sondland returned with lawyers to Capitol Hill to “review” his testimony in a move described as “striking” by Time.
Sondland said he remembered a conversation on 1 September, 2019, in Warsaw with Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to the president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
He recalled in his updated evidence: “I said that resumption of the US aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anticorruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.”
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues for £6–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Democrats have seized on the news. Chris Murphy, a senator from Connecticut, wrote on Twitter: “Nobody can pretend there’s any lingering debate over what happened. It’s over. Open and shut. Today, the one guy who said there wasn’t a corrupt aid-for-interference deal, changed his story to say that in fact, there was an aid-for-interference deal.”
Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, wrote in USA Today: “This is about more than just one call. We now know that the call was just one piece of a larger operation to redirect our foreign policy to benefit Donald Trump's personal and political interests, not the national interest.”
The US president is accused of withholding military aid to Ukraine to coerce Zelensky into investigating Biden and his son Hunter over unsubstantiated corruption charges.
Trump has repeatedly denied that military aid was tied to an investigation of Biden. In response to the Sondland transcripts, White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said they “show there is even less evidence for this illegitimate impeachment sham than previously thought”.
-
Why Saudi Arabia is muscling in on the world of animeUnder the Radar The anime industry is the latest focus of the kingdom’s ‘soft power’ portfolio
-
Scoundrels, spies and squires in January TVthe week recommends This month’s new releases include ‘The Pitt,’ ‘Industry,’ ‘Ponies’ and ‘A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms’
-
Venezuela: The ‘Donroe doctrine’ takes shapeFeature President Trump wants to impose “American dominance”
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
-
Trump’s power grab: the start of a new world order?Talking Point Following the capture of Nicolás Maduro, the US president has shown that arguably power, not ‘international law’, is the ultimate guarantor of security
-
A running list of everything Trump has named or renamed after himselfIn Depth The Kennedy Center is the latest thing to be slapped with Trump’s name
-
A running list of the international figures Donald Trump has pardonedin depth The president has grown bolder in flexing executive clemency powers beyond national borders
