Why has US reversed policy on Israeli settlements?
US secretary of state says Washington no longer finds settlements illegal

The US has announced that it no longer considers Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank to be inconsistent with international law.
Announcing the shift in position, which reverses four decades of US policy, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the media that “after carefully studying all sides of the legal debate, the United States has concluded that the establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not, per se, inconsistent with international law”.
He added: “Calling the establishment of civilian settlements inconsistent with international law hasn't worked. It hasn't advanced the cause of peace.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Israel welcomed the move, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying the development “rights a historical wrong”. He called on leaders of other countries to follow suit.
However, other reactions have been hostile. The chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat, said Washington’s decision was a risk to “global stability, security, and peace” and said it threatened to replace international law with “the law of the jungle”.
Writing on Twitter, Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, said that settlements were “a blatant violation” of international law which would have “dangerous consequences”.
The European Union’s foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini said the EU policy on Israeli settlements “all settlement activity is illegal under international law and it erodes the viability of the two-state solution and the prospects for a lasting peace”.
Settlements are one of the most divisive elements in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. These communities, built on land occupied by Israel in the 1967 Six Day War are widely considered illegal under international law, though Israel has always disputed this.
About 600,000 Jews live in about 140 settlements built since Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and these communities are considered a significant obstacle to peace.
Barbara Plett-Usher, the BBC’s Middle East correspondent, said in the wake of Pompeo’s announcement, any resolution to the conflict “is now more likely to be on Israel's terms, since it is by far the stronger party”.
The Guardian says the shift on settlements is “an extension of previous Trump policy, which has been marked by a series of radical pro-Israeli moves and the abandonment of Washington’s historic role as broker”.
It adds that Trump has already recognised Jerusalem as the Israeli capital, and Israeli sovereignty in the occupied Golan Heights.
Israeli newspaper Haaretz adds that the Trump administration has also made other highly partial moves, such as “slashing the budgets of the Palestinian Authority and the UNRWA the United Nations' agency to aid Palestinian refugees”.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial today–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
George Floyd: Did Black Lives Matter fail?
Feature The momentum for change fades as the Black Lives Matter Plaza is scrubbed clean
-
National debt: Why Congress no longer cares
Feature Rising interest rates, tariffs and Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill could sent the national debt soaring
-
Why are military experts so interested in Ukraine's drone attack?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The Zelenskyy government's massive surprise assault on Russian airfields was a decisive tactical victory — could it also be the start of a new era in autonomous warfare?
-
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation: the group behind controversial new aid programme
The Explainer Deadly shootings and chaotic scenes have been reported at aid sites after US group replaced UN humanitarian organisations
-
Starving Gazans overrun US-backed food aid hub
speed read Israeli troops fired warning shots at the Palestinians
-
Israel's Western allies pull back amid Gaza escalation
speed read Britain and the EU are reconsidering allegiance with Israel as the Gaza siege continues
-
Israel-US 'rift': is Trump losing patience with Netanyahu?
Today's Big Question US president called for an end to Gaza war and negotiated directly with Hamas to return American hostage, amid rumours of strained relations
-
Israel's plan to occupy Gaza
In Depth Operation Gideon's Chariots will see Israel sending thousands of troops into Gaza later this month to seize control of the strip
-
Can the world stop Israel from starving Gaza?
Today's Big Question Total blockade on food and aid enters its third month, and Israel is accused of 'weaponising starvation'
-
Israel approves plan to take over Gaza indefinitely
speed read Benjamin Netanyahu says the country is 'on the eve of a forceful entry'
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come