Can Prince Andrew be subpoenaed in Jeffrey Epstein case?
US investigators consider options as Andrew ‘completely shuts the door’ to co-operation
Prince Andrew will not voluntarily co-operate with US officials investigating the case of the deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, it has been claimed.
Investigators are considering further options now that the Duke of York has “completely shut the door”, a New York prosecutor said on Monday.
The Prince was once a friend of Epstein, who died last year while in custody awaiting trial for sex trafficking.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Geoffrey Berman, the US attorney in Manhattan, said: “Contrary to Prince Andrew’s very public offer to co-operate with our investigation into Epstein’s co-conspirators, an offer that was conveyed via press release, Prince Andrew has now completely shut the door on voluntary co-operation and our office is considering its options.”
Andrew said in November 2019 that he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required”.
The Duke has been accused of having sex three times with Virginia Giuffre, who says she was trafficked by Epstein, says The Guardian.
Andrew denies all claims of sexual misconduct relating to the Epstein case, and having had sex with Giuffre.
He has previously been said to be “angry” and “bewildered” over accusations that he has failed to co-operate with US authorities over the Epstein investigation.
But can he be forced to help with their enquiries?
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
What is a subpoena?
A subpoena is court-ordered demand for a person to take part in legal proceedings, generally by appearing in court or producing documentation.
Other demands can include providing medical information, DNA samples, computer files and equipment, tax information and photographs and other media.
A person failing to comply with a subpoena may face civil or criminal penalties, such as fines, imprisonment, or both, says legal website FindLaw.
How would it work for Andrew?
If someone ignores a subpoena, investigators can ask a judge to issue a warrant to compel the person to adhere to it.
“But such tactics are much more difficult if the person in question is a foreign citizen living abroad – not to mention a member of the British royal family,” says The New York Times. “The United States government would have to ask the United Kingdom to extradite the Duke of York as a material witness, a highly unusual proceeding.”
But if the Duke visits the US of his own volition, then the hurdle of extradition is removed.
A lawyer to five of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims told BBC Radio 4 in January that she was among a number of lawyers who would want to subpoena Andrew if he returned to the US.
Gloria Allred told the BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “We could, also, in our civil lawsuit, seek to subpoena Prince Andrew. Certainly, if he ever came back to the United States - that would be one of the first things that I'm sure a lot of lawyers, including me, would want to do.
“If he has done nothing wrong, which appears to be what he has claimed, then why won’t he talk to law enforcement?
“No response is the same as zero co-operation. This is ridiculous. It’s just not acceptable. This is a disservice to the victims,” said The Telegraph in January.
Lawyers for Prince Andrew are thought to have assessed the evidence against the Duke and concluded that the US does not have the power to subpoena him, The Telegraph now reports.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Putin says Russia isn't weakened by Syria setback
Speed Read Russia had been one of the key backers of Syria's ousted Assad regime
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Georgia DA Fani Willis removed from Trump case
Speed Read Willis had been prosecuting the election interference case against the president-elect
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Democrats blame 'President Musk' for looming shutdown
Speed Read The House of Representatives rejected a spending package that would've funding the government into 2025
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Anti-monarchy protesters arrested at Charles’ accession ceremonies
Speed Read History tutor in Oxford claims to have been detained for shouting ‘who elected him?’
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Should Prince Philip’s will be kept secret?
Talking Point Controversial practice in ‘national interest’ despite claims it enables Royal Family to hide assets
By The Week Staff Published
-
A timeline of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s legal action against UK press
feature Duke of Sussex launched latest complaint against Associated Newspapers this week
By The Week Staff Published
-
What next for Prince Andrew after sex abuse case settlement?
Today's Big Question Campaigners ask how Duke of York is funding payout to Virginia Roberts Giuffre and ‘substantial donation’ to victims’ rights charity
By The Week Staff Published
-
Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre settle sexual abuse lawsuit for undisclosed amount
news
By Brigid Kennedy Published
-
The fallout of stripping Prince Andrew’s royal titles
Under the Radar ‘Brutal’ decision rules out return to public life for the duke – and may sound warning to Prince Harry
By The Week Staff Published
-
What could Prince Andrew have faced in Virginia Giuffre sex abuse trial?
feature Duke of York agrees to pay ‘substantial donation’ in out-of-court settlement
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ghislaine Maxwell trial: will jurors’ sex abuse revelations lead to a retrial?
feature Lawyers for former socialite say judge ‘can and should order’ new hearing
By The Week Staff Published