Princess Micheal of Kent has angered animal lovers by arguing that animals do not have rights because they don't pay taxes.
The royal, who married the Queen's cousin, said: "I'm a great animal lover and I'm involved in a lot of conservation, but animals don't have rights."
"They don't have bank accounts. They don't vote," she added. "You only have rights if you pay your taxes. You earn your rights."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Animal rights groups branded her assessment "daft" as it means that children and certain adults are also not entitled to rights.
Elisa Allen, associate director of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) urged the princess to exercise caution in opining at all on animal rights issues.
"PETA urges Princess Michael to study the subject, rather than making an off-the-cuff statement that reflects ignorance of the issue of what fundamental rights animals have, which do not include the right to drive a car or build up an overdraft," she told The Times.
Actor and animal lover Ricky Gervais also joined criticism of the princess. "Animals might not pay taxes but they certainly work harder than this f****** waste of space," he tweeted.
The princess has a long-running feud with animal rights groups over her love of fur coats and hatred for squirrels and foxes. She once said that "there is a lot of nonsense talked about fur" and threatened to put shards of glass in Christmas wreaths to kill squirrels.
She has also courted controversy in the past by describing more senior members of the royal family as "boring" and calling Princess Diana poorly educated.
"Her gift for making forthright remarks is so well observed in royal circles that, by her own admission, she is prohibited from speaking to the press," says the Times.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
-
Positive evidenceCartoons
-
10 things you need to know today: September 26, 2023
Daily Briefing Congress returns to work with shutdown looming, Ukraine says it killed Russia's Black Sea Fleet commander, and more
-
Why the Roman Empire is suddenly everywhere online
The Explainer It fell more than 1,500 years ago — so why is it dominating social media?
-
Pros and cons of a vegan diet for pets
Pros and Cons Plant-based food might have some health benefits for dogs
-
‘In the modern world, the workaholic chino-wearers march ahead’
Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis and commentary from the British and international press
-
Animals removed from Albanian ‘zoo of hell’
Speed Read Authorities force their way into a private zoo to rescue lions, deer and a bear
-
Fur mislabelling scandal could lead to total ban
Speed Read MPs recommend banning all real fur imports in wake of scandal
-
Pet shops could be banned from selling puppies
In Depth Defra considering ban on all third-party sales to crack down on unscrupulous dealers
-
CCTV to be made compulsory in all UK slaughterhouses
Speed Read Abattoirs will be forced to install cameras under new rules to crackdown on animal abuse
-
Sick pet is grounds for time off, Italian court rules
In Depth Animal rights group says decision is ‘step forward’ for push to recognise animals as family members
-
Greyhound racing banned in New South Wales
Speed Read Australian state government imposes total ban on sport because of 'horrific' cruelty
