A backlash is growing over new rules for primary school grammar tests that limit the use of exclamation marks.
Teachers "are up in arms" over guidance they claim is old-fashioned and inaccurate, says the Sunday Times.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"A sentence that ends in an exclamation mark, but which does not have one of the grammatical patterns shown above, is not considered to be creditworthy as an exclamation," say the guidelines.
However, education experts warn the move could put children off from writing creatively.
"Donnez-moi a break!" says Professor John Sutherland, the author of How Good Is Your Grammar?.
"It is nonsense of the highest degree," he told the Sunday Times. "I am not surprised teachers wearily sigh when these instructions come down from Whitehall."
Prof Sutherland and others on social media have been quick to point out that the punctuation tool is used liberally by many in Westminster, with the academic saying: "'Cripes! Yikes!' Boris Johnson lives by exclamation marks. If you ruled them out, poor old Boris would be deflated like a collapsed balloon."
The Independent also takes aim at the government, arguing that "orders, imprecations, pleas for mercy, none of these work half so well without the magic intensifier".
However, The Spectator's Melanie McDonagh makes a broader point about class and language.
"It's rather an indicator of privilege that you can afford to play fast and loose with language. You can make free with syntax and punctuation if you know what you're doing," she says.
"For the less sure-footed – and it's often a class thing – you cling to the rules because the usage around you isn't any guide to what's acceptable."
Nevertheless, she concludes the rule on exclamation marks "is nuts".
-
September 14 editorial cartoonsCartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include RFK Jr on the hook, the destruction of discourse, and more
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-warTalking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’
-
Crossword: September 14, 2025The Week's daily crossword puzzle
-
The pros and cons of banning cellphones in classroomsPros and cons The devices could be major distractions
-
School phone bans: Why they're spreadingFeature 17 states are imposing all-day phone bans in schools
-
Schools: The return of a dreaded fitness testFeature Donald Trump is bringing the Presidential Fitness Test back to classrooms nationwide
-
Send reforms: government's battle over special educational needsThe Explainer Current system in 'crisis' but parents fear overhaul will leave many young people behind
-
Education: Can public schools be religious?Feature A Supreme Court seems ready to rule in favor of religious charter schools in Oklahoma, which could reshape public education
-
America's academic brain drain has begunIN THE SPOTLIGHT As the Trump administration targets universities and teachers, educators are eying greener academic pastures elsewhere — and other nations are starting to take notice
-
Schools' Send crisis: how can it be fixed?Today's Big Question Government urged to reform support for children with special educational needs and disabilities and save councils from bankruptcy
-
Unschooling: the radical education trend raising eyebrowsUnder the radar Some parents are letting their children lead their education
