Facebook shuts down experiment after AI invents own language
Researchers close project after machines develop own way of communicating unintelligible to humans

Bob: i can i i everything else . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Alice: balls have zero to me to me to me to me to me to me to me to me toBob: you i everything else . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Alice: balls have a ball to me to me to me to me to me to me to meBob: i i can i i i everything else . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Alice: balls have a ball to me to me to me to me to me to me to me
Despite looking like the script from a truly terrible television sitcom, this conversation actually occurred between two Artificial Intelligence programs, developed inside Facebook in order to perfect the art of negotiation.
At first, the two were speaking to each other in plain English. But then researchers realised they’d made a mistake in the machines' programming.
"There was no reward to sticking to English language," Dhruv Batra, visiting research scientist from Georgia Tech at Facebook AI Research (Fair) told FastCo.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As these two agents competed to get the best deal, "neither was offered any sort of incentive for speaking as a normal person would," says FastCo.
So they began to diverge, eventually rearranging comprehensible words into seemingly nonsensical sentences, causing the experiment to be suspended.
"Agents (or programs) will drift off understandable language and invent codewords for themselves," explained Batra. "Like if I say 'the' five times, you interpret that to mean I want five copies of this item. This isn’t so different from the way communities of humans create shorthands."
But the researchers were keen to stress, the experiment was not abandoned because of any worries about the potentially negative effects of the robots communicating.
Fair researcher Mike Lewis told FastCo they had simply decided "our interest was having bots who could talk to people," not efficiently to each other, and thus opted to require them to write to each other legibly.
This is not the first time Artificial Intelligence machines have appeared to create their own language.
In November last year, Google revealed that the AI it uses for its Translate tool had created its own language, which it would translate phrases into and out of before delivering words in the target language.
Reporting on the development at the time, Tech Crunch said: "This 'interlingua' seems to exist as a deeper level of representation that sees similarities between a sentence or a word."
"It could be something sophisticated, or it could be something simple," added the website, but "the fact that it exists at all — an original creation of the system’s own to aid in its understanding of concepts it has not been trained to understand — is, philosophically speaking, pretty powerful stuff".
These recent developments have led to ethical discussions about the potential problems of machines communicating with one other without human intervention.
"In the Facebook case, the only thing the chatbots were capable of doing was coming up with a more efficient way to trade," says Gizmodo.
But there are "probably good reasons not to let intelligent machines develop their own language which humans would not be able to meaningfully understand," the website adds.
"Hopefully humans will also be smart enough not to plug experimental machine learning programs into something very dangerous, like an army of laser-toting androids or a nuclear reactor."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Critics' choice: Three takes on tavern dining
Feature A second Minetta Tavern, A 1946 dining experience, and a menu with a mission
By The Week US
-
Film reviews: Warfare and A Minecraft Movie
Feature A combat film that puts us in the thick of it and five misfits fall into a cubic-world adventure
By The Week US
-
What to know before lending money to family or friends
the explainer Ensure both your relationship and your finances remain intact
By Becca Stanek, The Week US
-
Fake AI job seekers are flooding U.S. companies
In the Spotlight It's getting harder for hiring managers to screen out bogus AI-generated applicants
By Theara Coleman, The Week US
-
Meta on trial: What will become of Mark Zuckerberg's social media empire?
Today's Big Question Despite the CEO's attempt to ingratiate himself with Trump, Meta is on trial, accused by the U.S. government of breaking antitrust law
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
How might AI chatbots replace mental health therapists?
Today's Big Question Clients form 'strong relationships' with tech
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
What are AI hallucinations?
The Explainer Artificial intelligence is known for making things up – and that can cause real damage
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK
-
The backlash against ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli filter
The Explainer The studio's charming style has become part of a nebulous social media trend
By Theara Coleman, The Week US
-
Not there yet: The frustrations of the pocket AI
Feature Apple rushes to roll out its ‘Apple Intelligence’ features but fails to deliver on promises
By The Week US
-
What does an ex-executive's new memoir reveal about Meta's free speech pivot?
Today's Big Question 'Careless People' says Facebook was ready to do China censorship
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
OpenAI's new model is 'really good' at creative writing
Under the Radar CEO Sam Altman says he is impressed. But is this merely an attempt to sell more subscriptions?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US