Looking after a sick pet constitutes “serious personal grounds” for time off work, an Italian court has ruled.
A female complainant petitioned the court after her employer - Rome’s La Sapienza university - refused to grant her paid leave to take her dog to the vet.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The 53-year-old, who works in the university library, has not been identified, but the dog in question is a 12-year-old English setter Cucciola, Corriere della Sera reports.
In February, the dog had to have a tumour removed, and in May she needed treatment for laryngeal paralysis, a disease affecting the throat which restricts the animal’s ability to eat, bark and breathe.
On both occasions, Cucciola’s owner, who lives alone, argued that she had no-one else who could take Cucciola to the vet and take care of her during her recovery, and that she was thus entitled to back pay for the two days she had taken off work.
The Italian Anti-Vivisection League (LAV), which took on the woman’s case, argued that providing a pet with necessary medical care is a legal requirement and should be recognised as compelling personal grounds for absence.
Under Italian law, “people who abandon an animal to ‘grave suffering’ can be jailed for a year and fined up to €10,000 (£9,000),” says the BBC.
The court accepted the argument and ruled that La Sapienza must give the employee back pay for the two days she was absent from work.
“I’m very pleased,” the woman told Corriere della Sera after the ruling. “After my battle other people will be able to take care of their pets without using up their holiday.”
LAV president Gianluca Felicetti said the decision set an important precedent for other pet owners, as well as being a “significant step forward” in recognising domestic animals as members of their owner’s family, La Stampa reports.
-
The 9 restaurants to eat at this very momentThe Week Recommends They’re award-winning. Isn’t that reason enough?
-
The UK’s opioid crisis: why the stats don’t add upThe Explainer A new report has revealed that the UK’s total of opioid-related deaths could be much greater than official figures show
-
Gaza genocide: will UN ruling change anything?Today's Big Question Commission of Inquiry’s findings ‘give unprecedented weight’ to genocide claims
-
China is silently expanding its influence in American citiesUnder the Radar New York City and San Francisco, among others, have reportedly been targeted
-
Delhi's dogs earn Supreme Court reprieveIN THE SPOTLIGHT After an outcry from the public and animal rights activists, India's Supreme Court walks back a controversial plan to round the city's stray dog population into shelters
-
The Strait of Messina: a bridge too far?Talking Point Giorgia Meloni's government wants to build the world's longest suspension bridge, fulfilling the ancient Roman vision of connecting Sicily to the Italian mainland
-
How China uses 'dark fleets' to circumvent trade sanctionsThe Explainer The fleets are used to smuggle goods like oil and fish
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Superyachts are getting caught up in spy scandalsThe Explainer China and Russia have both been accused of spying maneuvers on the open sea
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
-
Why Russia removed the Taliban's terrorist designationThe Explainer Russia had designated the Taliban as a terrorist group over 20 years ago
