Will the NHS be ‘for sale’ after Brexit?
May refuses to rule out opening up the NHS to US drug companies as part of post-Brexit deal
Theresa May has stoked fears the NHS could be opened up for exploitation by US drug firms as part of a post-Brexit trade deal, refusing to say the health service would be excluded from future talks.
Responding to a question in the Commons from Liberal Democrats leader Vince Cable, the Prime Minister said it was too early to judge what “requirements” the US would have for post-Brexit trade discussions.
“The Prime Minister knows that one of the key objectives of American trade negotiators in any future deal after Brexit is to secure access for American companies to business in the NHS,” Cable said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Can she give an absolute guarantee that in those negotiations the NHS will be excluded from their scope, and can she confirm that in her conversations with President Trump she’s made it absolutely clear to him that the NHS is not for sale?”
May’s critics warned that the US would use any future deal to demand the health service was opened up to private firms from across the Atlantic.
Her answer was seized on by Labour MP Peter Kyle, a supporter of the pro-EU Open Britain campaign, who said: “Theresa May just gave Donald Trump the green light to get his hands on our National Health Service.”
Labour’s shadow health secretary, Jon Ashworth, has previously warned a trade deal could lead to “stealth privatisation” of the NHS.
The proportion of health service contracts being won by non-NHS firms ballooned to almost 70% last year, says The Independent. “Critics say this rising ‘privatisation’ has opened the door to US health firms, who already view the NHS as a goldmine,” adds the paper.
Turning the question on its head, The Economist asks whether American companies actually want to invest in the NHS. Might they instead stick to the far more profitable private healthcare system in Britain, the magazine asks.
“Government spending on health as a share of GDP is lower in Britain than in most of western Europe and the gap is forecast to increase. Many NHS trusts are in deficit. And dealing with the NHS can be a messy and frustrating business, far removed from the cash-rich American health-care machine,” the magazine argues.
Under a recent EU directive which means health commissioners must tell the open market when any NHS contract is being tendered, there’s even an argument that “remaining within the EU will encourage more private healthcare providers into the NHS”, argues the anti-Brexit New European.
Speaking after Theresa May’s evasive Commons performance, an official spokesman later clarified that the prime minister had made clear that “the NHS is not for sale and it never will be” in February 2017.
The spokesman added: “Any trade deal ensures decisions about public services continue to be made by UK governments, not by our trade partners.
“The UK’s public health sector is protected by specific exceptions and reservations in all EU trade arrangements and, as we leave the EU, the UK will continue to ensure that rigorous protections for the NHS are included in all trade agreements it is party to.”
However, with the UK’s global standing and bargaining power greatly diminished outside the EU, and the Government desperate for a new trade deal with the US, access to the NHS may be a matter that comes up for discussion again.
Earlier this week, Donald Trump attacked the health service as “going broke and not working”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The history of Donald Trump's election conspiracy theories
The Explainer How the 2024 Republican nominee has consistently stoked baseless fears of a stolen election
By David Faris Published
-
Two ancient cities have been discovered along the Silk Road
Under the radar The discovery changed what was known about the old trade route
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
'People shouldn't have to share the road with impaired drivers'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
ACA opens 2025 enrollment, enters 2024 race
Speed Read Mike Johnson promises big changes to the Affordable Care Act if Trump wins the election
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Brexit, Matt Hancock and black swans: five takeaways from Covid inquiry report
The Explainer UK was 'unprepared' for pandemic and government 'failed' citizens with flawed response, says damning report
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
A 'transformative' gene therapy for haemophilia B
The Explainer Costly treatment that could be 'truly life-changing' for patients with rare blood disorder gets funding boost
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
Infected blood scandal: will justice be served?
Today's Big Question Government apologises for 'decades-long moral failure' and promises £10bn compensation but true accountability may take far longer
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Immunotherapy and hay fever
The Explainer Research shows that the treatment could provide significant relief from symptoms for many hay fever sufferers
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The pros and cons of universal health care
Pros and Cons A medical system that serves everyone comes with its own costs, and they're not only financial
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Last updated
-
Martha's Rule: patients given right to urgent second opinion
The Explainer Hospitals in England will launch new scheme that will allow access to a rapid treatment review
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The contaminated blood scandal
The Explainer Widely regarded as the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS, the public inquiry is due to publish its report in May
By The Week UK Published