The gambling watchdog has called for a £30 upper limit for fixed odds betting terminals, in a bid to tackle problem gambling.
The machines have been called the “crack cocaine” of gambling by campaigners who say they let players lose money too quickly, leading to addiction and social problems.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Gambling Commission recommended the stake on gambling machines offering slots games, such as traditional fruit machines, should be limited to £2. It also suggested the betting industry works with it to make playing times and monetary limits “more effective”.
The Government has been looking to cut the maximum limit on FOBTs since 2016 but the recommended cap is higher than campaigners had sought, and £10 more than many industry experts had predicted. It offers some relief for investors in gambling companies and has pushed the share prices of British bookmakers up, reports The Daily Telegraph.
Labour deputy leader Tom Watson called the report “deeply disappointing” and accused the Commission of caving in to industry pressure. Now the Government must decide whether to implement the recommendations.
A Government impact assessment last year found cutting the maximum stake on in-shop FTBOs from £100 to £30 would cost the British economy £1.7bn in taxes over the next decade.
Gambling Commission chief executive Neil McArthur said: “In our judgement, a stake cut for fixed odds betting terminals alone doesn’t go far enough to protect vulnerable people. That is why we have recommended a stake cut plus a comprehensive package of other measures to protect consumers.
“We have proposed actions that will tackle both the risk of harm and provide solutions that are sustainable in the longer term.”
However, Grant Humphrey of EY said the decision “deals another blow to the future of the high street, which is already suffering with a recent spike of chain restaurants and retail closures”.
-
Why has the U.S. scaled down its stance on human rights?Today's Big Question The Trump administration has curtailed previous criticisms of human rights violations
-
August 14 editorial cartoonsCartoons Thursday’s political cartoons include Donald Trump and JD Vance at a summit, Putin's 'peace' plan, and Jeffrey Epstein haunting the White House
-
Weapons: Julia Garner stars in 'hyper-eerie' psychological thrillerThe Week Recommends Zach Cregger's 'top notch' new film opens with 17 children disappearing at exactly the same time
-
Locals speculate about aliens in WalesTall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
-
The sinister side to India’s fantasy gaming crazefeature Fantasy gaming is booming in India, despite the country's ban on gambling
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drugSpeed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policySpeed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UKSpeed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakersSpeed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
