A controversial public inquiry into undercover policing will now not deliver its final report until at least 2023, almost a decade after it was set up, leading to accusations the Government is trying to delay or bury its findings.
It was launched to address a string of allegations surrounding the activities of undercover units, most notably how Scotland Yard spied on the campaign seeking justice for murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence and how undercover officers deceived women into intimate relationships, in order to extract information or gain access to organisations.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Guardian says “there has been growing discontent among non-state participants in the inquiry, with concerns raised about former undercover officers being granted anonymity during the proceedings, as well as the slow speed of progress”.
It has already cost more than £10m and had originally been due to conclude this year, but following a strategic review its final date was pushed back five years.
Up to 60 campaigners, including former undercover officers, have walked out of hearings debating whether undercover officers should have their identities revealed. There have also been calls for the inquiry to be led by a panel, which would investigate institutional racism and sexism, rather than a single judge.
Defending the delay, the inquiry chairman, Sir John Mitting, said he would not appoint panel members until the fact-finding stage had concluded in 2021, arguing it “would impose a heavy cost in both time and money”.
-
Should you add your child to your credit card?The Explainer You can make them an authorized user on your account in order to help them build credit
-
Cracker Barrel crackup: How the culture wars are upending corporate brandingIn the Spotlight Is it 'woke' to leave nostalgia behind?
-
'It's hard to discern what it actually means'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The ethics behind facial recognition vans and policingThe Explainer The government is rolling out more live facial recognition technology across England
-
The Met police's stop and search overhaulThe Explainer More than 8,500 Londoners have helped put together a new charter for the controversial practice
-
NCHIs: the controversy over non-crime hate incidentsThe Explainer Is the policing of non-crime hate incidents an Orwellian outrage or an essential tool of modern law enforcement?
-
The new powers to stop stalking in the UKThe Explainer Updated guidance could help protect more victims, but public is losing trust in police and battered criminal justice system
-
'Warriors' vs 'guardians': the pitfalls of police recruit training in the USIN DEPTH American police training fails to keep pace with the increasingly complex realities that today's officers face
-
Derek Chauvin, killer of George Floyd, reportedly stabbed in prisonSpeed Read Chauvin was convicted of Floyd's murder in 2021
-
Nicola Bulley: police under fire for releasing personal informationSpeed Read Disclosure was 'avoidable and unnecessary' and led to 'breakdown of public confidence', College of Policing finds
-
Protest politics: when should police intervene?Talking Point Calls for law change after shouts of 'jihad' on UK streets found not to be terrorism or public order offences
