Vote Leave boss ordered to appear before MPs

Motion last used in 1920 means Dominic Cummings risks being held in ‘contempt of parliament’ if he fails to show

MPs have taken the unprecedented step of ordering Dominic Cumming to appear in Parliament
(Image credit: Jack Taylor/Getty Images)

The former boss of the Vote Leave campaign has been ordered to appear before a committee of MPs at risk of being held in contempt of Parliament.

Now MPs haven taken the rare step of accusing him of “holding Parliament in contempt” by snubbing the request and voted to order him to appear before the committee on or before 20 June.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

It is thought to be the first motion of its kind to pass through Parliament since 1920, and has been described by The Independent as “a rare show of parliamentary strength”.

It is unclear what happens if he refuses to show up. Theoretically he could be arrested and fined if he flouts the motion, “but the sanction is rarely used and is a symbolic slap on the wrist”, says the Daily Mail.

“In their darker imaginings, the Commons authorities fear a situation where the Serjeant at Arms is dispatched to fetch a reluctant witness,” says BBC parliamentary correspondent Mark D’Arcy “only to become embroiled in an embarrassing, and probably televised stand-off”.

However, “it is far from clear that the Serjeant has powers to enter private property, still less to put Mr Cummings in an arm lock and frogmarch him to Westminster”, he says.

More importantly, the Independent says this row could also set an “interesting precedent” as the committee has unsuccessfully tried to compel Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg to give evidence.

Explore More