Can MPs force people to testify?
Former Vote Leave strategist Dominic Cummings follows Mark Zuckerberg in declining request to appear before MPs

The head of the Vote Leave Brexit campaign has become the latest public figure to refuse to appear before MPs, sparking debate about whether parliament should have the power to force people to testify.
Votes Leave’s chief strategist, Dominic Cummings, who was credited with being the brains behind the successful Brexit campaign, told MPs on the select committee investigating fake news he would not be willing to answer questions in public before the Electoral Commission finished its investigation into the referendum campaign, he said in a blog post.
Cummings, who is set to be portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch in an forthcoming Channel 4 dramatisation of the referendum campaign, rejected a formal summons from the digital culture, media and sport committee, which demanded he appear before the end of May.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
He is not the only public figure to refuse an invitation to appear before MPs. Earlier this week, says The Guardian, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he would not answer questions from parliament surrounding data and privacy in the wake of the Cambridge Analytic scandal. He instead got one of his deputies to appear in his place.
The Metro described the move as “sticking tow figures up at the UK”, while committee chair, Damian Collins, called it “absolutely astonishing”. Zuckerberg has since agreed to answer questions before MEPs in the European Parliament.
The Guardian says two refusals in less than a week “raises questions about the system of compelling reluctant witnesses to appear in front of parliament”.
In theory, MPs have “the power to issue fines or even threaten imprisonment for non-attendance”, says the paper, but in reality, “the system relies largely on consent, formal rebukes and the idea that individuals can be shamed by the media into attending”.
One such example is Sports Direct founder, Mike Ashley, who bowed to public pressure and appeared before MPs to explain his company’s treatment of workers, after initially indicating he would reject a formal summons.
In most cases, either through fear of legal repercussions, public condemnation or as an exercise in damage-limitation, a formal summons will compel people to appear before MPs.
But it remains an option of last resort, and carries with it serious risks if they are ignored, says Hannah White, of the Institute for Government. “Every time everyone observe the emperor has no clothes, in that parliament can’t force people to come, they lose a little bit of their authority,” she says.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation: the group behind Gaza's controversial new aid programme
The Explainer Deadly shootings and chaotic scenes have been reported at aid sites after US group replaced UN humanitarian organisations
-
Is UK's new defence plan transformational or too little, too late?
Today's Big Question Labour's 10-year strategy 'an exercise in tightly bounded ambition' already 'overshadowed by a row over money'
-
How much should doctors trust parental intuition?
In The Spotlight Study finds parents' concern can be better at spotting critical illness than vital signs
-
Angela Rayner: Labour's next leader?
Today's Big Question A leaked memo has sparked speculation that the deputy PM is positioning herself as the left-of-centre alternative to Keir Starmer
-
Brexit 'reset' deal: how will it work?
In Depth Keir Stamer says the deal is a 'win-win', but he faces claims that he has 'surrendered' to Brussels on fishing rights
-
Are we entering the post-Brexit era?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer's 'big bet' with his EU reset deal is that 'nobody really cares' about Brexit any more
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
Can Starmer sell himself as the 'tough on immigration' PM?
Today's Big Question Former human rights lawyer 'now needs to own the change – not just mouth the slogans' to win over a sceptical public
-
Has Starmer put Britain back on the world stage?
Talking Point UK takes leading role in Europe on Ukraine and Starmer praised as credible 'bridge' with the US under Trump
-
Left on read: Labour's WhatsApp dilemma
Talking Point Andrew Gwynne has been sacked as health minister over messages posted in a Labour WhatsApp group
-
Silicon Valley: bending the knee to Donald Trump
Talking Point Mark Zuckerberg's dismantling of fact-checking and moderating safeguards on Meta ushers in a 'new era of lies'