Is Russia eyeing up Georgia again?
Russian PM Dmitry Medvedev threatens ‘terrible conflict’ as neighbouring nation edges closer to Nato accession

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has warned that the possibility of Georgia joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) could trigger a “terrible conflict” and questioned why the military alliance would consider such a move.
Medvedev’s comments yesterday come weeks after President Vladimir Putin warned Nato against cultivating closer ties with Ukraine and Georgia, saying that such a policy was irresponsible and would have “consequences”, Reuters reports.
Nato requires all members states to agree to defend other members in response to an attack by any external party. Russia is not a member.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The independent nation borders fellow former Soviet Union state Georgia, and waged a brief but consequential war against its neighbour in 2008 over Georgia’s potential accession to Nato.
Medvedev’s apparent threats of a fresh conflict have been condemned by Georgia’s Foreign Ministry, which claimed that Russia was “conducting large-scale military drills involving thousands of troops and hundreds of vehicles in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia”.
“We shouldn’t be afraid to call things by their names. What Russia did and is doing against a sovereign government is a war between Russia [and] Georgia; it’s aggression, it’s an occupation and it’s a violation of all international norms,” Georgian President Giorgi Margvelashvili told ministers from Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Ukraine at a meeting in the capital Tbilisi.
“The aggressor’s appetite has only increased after the invasion,” he said.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What happened in 2008?
The debate surrounding Georgia’s accession to Nato is a long-running and contentious one. In January 2008, the country put the question to the public in a non-binding referendum, which saw 77% of its citizens come out in support of joining the alliance.
Nato subsequently assured Georgia that it would be able to join.
However, the threat of such a move saw the country’s relationship with Russia deteriorate rapidly, sparking a diplomatic crisis that eventually led to war and the annexation of parts of Georgia by Russia. Medvedev was then president of Russia.
Russian tanks entered South Ossetia on 7 August 2008 under the pretence of coming to the aid of the region’s citizens, many of whom had been given Russian passports by the Kremlin.
Within days, Russian forces, flanked by local separatists, had established total control of South Ossetia and even attacked the suburbs of Tbilisi.
The military of the separatist Republic of Abkhazia, a remote region in the west of Georgia, used the opportunity to open a second front against Georgia and declare independence, with the help of Russia.
With the Russian army poised to advance into Tbilisi, Medvedev accepted a truce mediated by the European Union, although Russia refused to relinquish control over Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Could war break out again?
Asked what would happen if Georgia joined Nato without the two disputed regions, and whether there was a risk of conflict, Medvedev said: “Yes, clearly so, because we view Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states. We understand that if any other country claims that they are part of its national territory, this may have severe consequences.
“Therefore, I hope that the Nato leadership will have enough sense not to take any steps in this direction.”
Nevertheless, both Georgia and Nato appear willing to defy Russia. Reuters reports that prominent Georgian politicians remain “keen for their country to join the Western military alliance”, while Nato leaders discussed ties with Georgia at their summit in Brussels in July.
In an article for The Guardian, Tamar Beruchashvili, Georgian ambassador in the UK, writes that “occupation of 20% of the territory of sovereign Georgia and continuous military build-up seriously undermines security and peace in wider Europe and requires serious engagement from the international community”. Nato members must stand by their unilateral support for the nation, Beruchashvili says.
However, much of this may be political rhetoric and lip service, The Times suggests. “Despite verbal support for Georgia, some Western diplomats express disquiet in private at the prospect of it joining Nato,” says the newspaper. “They believe the alliance would be unable to protect it in the event of a conflict with Russia.”
Furthermore, under Nato rules, countries with territorial conflicts cannot join the alliance.
-
Quiz of The Week: 27 September – 3 October
Quiz Have you been paying attention to The Week’s news?
-
Hooray for Brollywood: the UK’s film industry is booming – for now
In The Spotlight US production giants are moving operations across the pond, but Trump tariffs threaten to bring British golden era to a sudden end
-
Child trust funds explained as over £1.5 million remains unclaimed
The Explainer HMRC data shows hundreds of thousands of young people have yet to claim money they are entitled to
-
Ukraine: Trump’s latest stalling tactic
Feature Trump plans to impose sanctions on Russia only if all 31 NATO states join in and agree to ban Russian oil imports
-
Russian drone tests Romania as Trump spins
Speed Read Trump is ‘resisting congressional plans to impose newer and tougher penalties on Russia’s energy sector’
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raid
Speed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?
Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
Trump embraces NATO after budget vow, charm offensive
Speed Read The president reversed course on his longstanding skepticism of the trans-Atlantic military alliance
-
'The arts are not just expressions of creativity'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is the G7 still relevant?
Talking Point Donald Trump's early departure cast a shadow over this week's meeting of the world's major democracies