Why BA refuses to carry lab animals
Airline facing legal battle over its blanket ban on transporting animals for medical research

British Airways is facing a legal battle from scientists trying to end the airline’s blanket ban on flying lab animals, according to reports.
The Times says that “although airlines carry animals if they are pets or for zoos, campaigning by animal-rights activists has meant that almost all refuse to take them if they are for medical research”.
Scientists claim that as a result, it is becoming increasingly difficult to secure animals for laboratory research into a host of serious diseases.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The newspaper is backing the scientists, in an editorial that argues: “This research saves lives. Not one major recent breakthrough in treatments for premature babies, cancer, diabetes, cystic fibrosis or Parkinson’s disease would have been possible without it.”
The US National Association for Biomedical Research, a non-profit organisation representing animal researchers, has filed a complaint with the US Department of Transport against BA and three other airlines - United Airlines, China Southern Airlines and Qatar Airways.
The complaint argues that in banning animals bound for labs while carrying others if they are pets or for zoos, the carriers are “breaking rules concerning discrimination”, The Times reports.
Kirk Leech, from the European Animal Research Association, said that over the past decade, there had been a “haemorrhaging” of airlines willing to carry lab animals, because of “potential PR problems”.
“Animal research is a global endeavour,” Leech continued. “They are bred in one part of the world and transported to another. This is a drastic step, but there seems to be no way forward. Airlines have refused to budge.”
BA and the other three companies have until 26 September to respond, before the Department of Transport launches a formal investigation
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How will the new tax deductions on auto loans work?
the explainer Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a tax deduction on auto loan interest — but eligibility for the tax break is limited
-
Is Trump actually going to prosecute Obama for 'treason'?
Today's Big Question Or is this just a distraction from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal?
-
5 best movie sequels of all time
The Week Recommends The second time is only sometimes as good as the first
-
What would happen to Earth if humans went extinct?
The Explainer Human extinction could potentially give rise to new species and climates
-
Bad news, alpha males. You likely don't actually exist.
Under the radar Most primate communities are egalitarian
-
Scientists and Peter Jackson attempt to bring back an extinct bird — kind of
In the Spotlight Colossal Biosciences was the company behind the 'resurrected' dire wolves
-
Scientists want to regrow human limbs. Salamanders could lead the way.
Under the radar Humans may already have the genetic mechanism necessary
-
A potentially mutating bat virus has some scientists worried about the next pandemic
Under the Radar One subgroup of bat merbecovirus has scientists concerned
-
Dehorning rhinos sharply cuts poaching, study finds
Speed Read The painless procedure may be an effective way to reduce the widespread poaching of rhinoceroses
-
Sea lion proves animals can keep a beat
speed read A sea lion named Ronan beat a group of college students in a rhythmic dance-off, says new study
-
Humans heal much slower than other mammals
Speed Read Slower healing may have been an evolutionary trade-off when we shed fur for sweat glands