Ivanka Trump vs. Hillary Clinton: email blunders compared
President Trump’s daughter accused of hypocrisy as it emerges she also used personal email for government business
Ivanka Trump used a personal email account to send “hundreds of messages” about official White House business last year, according to US media reports.
President Donald Trump’s daughter, an official White House adviser, used her personal account to email aides, cabinet members and assistants, says The Washington Post.
This would amount to a violation of the public records rules, yet when asked about it, Ivanka reportedly said that she was “unfamiliar” with details of the regulations.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The president and his family have been accused of hypocrisy, having repeatedly branded former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton “crooked” for her use of a private email server, reports The Guardian.
But are the two allegations the same?
What did Ivanka do?
Anonymous White House sources told The Washington Post that during a recent public records lawsuit, ethics officials discovered she had often used her private email account to contact senior officials and White House aides in 2017, on a domain that she shares with her husband, fellow adviser Jared Kushner.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
A spokesperson for her lawyer confirmed that “while transitioning into government... Ms Trump sometimes used her private account, almost always for logistics and scheduling concerning her family”. The representative insisted that “no classified information was transmitted in the messages”.
However, this claim was disputed by the ethics officials. They found that Ivanka had “discussed or relayed official White House business” using the private email account, which may be a direct violation of the Presidential Records Act.
This law requires that all official White House communications and records be preserved as a permanent archive of each administration. “Government officials must forward any official correspondence to a work account within 20 days,” explains the BBC.
Furthermore, her close relationship with Kushner, an important international negotiator in the Trump administration, means that she may be party to classified information, says CNN.
How is this different to the Clinton email saga?
Ivanka’s behaviour has “alarmed” some of President Trump’s inner circle, who fear her practices “bore similarities” to the Clinton scandal, the Post reports.
During the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly attacked his Democratic rival for using a private email account for government business when she was US secretary of state.
However, the BBC notes that Clinton not only used a private account but also set up a separate email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York, that she used “for all work and personal emails during her four years in office”.
“She did not use, or even activate, a state.gov email account, which would have been hosted on servers owned and managed by the US government,” the broadcaster adds.
Clinton also claimed she was unaware of or misunderstood the rules.
She later said that none of the messages she sent or received using the server were “marked classified” - a claim that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) determined to be untrue. In fact, 110 of the emails contained classified information at the time they were sent or received.
The controversial FBI investigation into her emails launched by James Comey just days before voters went to the polls in 2016 “probably cost Hillary Clinton the election”, says The Guardian’s US columnist Jill Abramson.
The investigation concluded that Clinton should not face charges, but said that she and her aides had been “extremely careless” in their handling of classified information.
-
‘It is their greed and the pollution from their products that hurt consumers’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Jane Austen lives on at these timeless hotelsThe Week Recommends Here’s where to celebrate the writing legend’s 250th birthday
-
‘Mexico: A 500-Year History’ by Paul Gillingham and ‘When Caesar Was King: How Sid Caesar Reinvented American Comedy’ by David Margolickfeature A chronicle of Mexico’s shifts in power and how Sid Caesar shaped the early days of television
-
Pushing for peace: is Trump appeasing Moscow?In Depth European leaders succeeded in bringing themselves in from the cold and softening Moscow’s terms, but Kyiv still faces an unenviable choice
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
South Africa wraps up G20 summit boycotted by USSpeed Read Trump has been sparring with South Africa in recent months
-
Trump pushes new Ukraine peace planSpeed Read It involves a 28-point plan to end the war
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned
-
Nigeria confused by Trump invasion threatSpeed Read Trump has claimed the country is persecuting Christians
-
Ukraine: Donald Trump pivots againIn the Spotlight US president apparently warned Volodymyr Zelenskyy to accept Vladimir Putin’s terms or face destruction during fractious face-to-face