Passengers on the UK’s railway network will soon be able to choose which train operators they use for their journeys, under a new system that experts believe could revolutionise rail travel.
The reforms, which come into effect in April, will allow “open-access” operators to run services on routes currently served by government-contracted franchise operators, “provided that they pay a bigger share of costs for the upkeep of the railway”, The Times reports.
The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) says the changes “should encourage more competition in the passenger rail market” and drive down the cost of fares, as well as resulting in more train services and encourage innovation.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Rail Technology Magazine reports that open-access operators such as Hull Trains and Grand Central have “already shown that the competition they introduce leads to service improvements and growth in rail travel, and they were also the first services to introduce innovative services such as free Wi-Fi”.
The Competition and Markets Authority is also backing the changes, which the watchdog says could have a similar impact to the reforms seen in the airline industry, The Sun adds.
Paul Plummer, chief executive of the Rail Delivery Group, said: “Competition, provided through open-access operators or through competitions to run franchises, has delivered real benefits both for customers and taxpayers.”
However, the ORR’s senior manager for competition economics, Beth Tasker, warned that operators might cherry-pick the most profitable routes. “In the GB rail market, where there is a lot of public subsidy of franchised services, this would result in the cost of the railway to government going up,” she said. “Our policy must take this into account.”
The RMT union has warned that the reforms may lead to “even more fragmentation and profiteering on Britain’s broken rail system”.
-
5 museum-grade cartoons about Trump's Smithsonian purgeCartoons Artists take on institutional rebranding, exhibit interpretation, and more
-
Settling the West Bank: a death knell for a Palestine state?In the Spotlight The reality on the ground is that the annexation of the West Bank is all but a done deal
-
Sudoku medium: August 23, 2025The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
Is it finally all change for train Wi-Fi?In The Spotlight South Western Railway's 5G Wi-Fi service has changed the way passengers connect – but will the new system catch on?
-
Brief Canada rail lockout ends with arbitrationSpeed Read A prolonged shutdown could have threatened the country's supply chain
-
HS2: a runaway trainTalking Point PM may cut Manchester to Birmingham line of beleaguered rail project due to spiralling costs
-
Is Britain’s infrastructure failing?feature High costs, inflation, policy uncertainty and ‘nimby’ tax have led to ‘dire state’ of UK building projects
-
‘Ghost trains’ and armoured limos: how Vladimir Putin travels in secret luxuryUnder the Radar Planes, trains and automobiles make up the Russian president’s fleet of undercover travel options
-
How safe is India’s rail network?feature Narendra Modi’s costly modernisation programme in spotlight after worst train disaster in decades
-
How safe is train travel?feature The Week looks at the safety records of modern railways in Europe, the US and the UK
-
Will HS2 be scrapped and what has it cost so far?In Depth Experts say cutting costs on the controversial high-speed rail project could mean a slower and less regular service linking fewer locations
