Labour pledges to break up tech giants where necessary
Deputy leader Tom Watson sets out plans for new regulator to prevent market abuse

Labour has called for a new dedicated digital regulator that would have the power to break up major technology companies in a bid to empower consumers.
Speaking in London yesterday, the party’s deputy leader Tom Watson set out a range of new policies to take on the tech industry, including a new Digital Bill of Rights to protect how personal data is collected and a “legal duty of care” for social media firms to safeguard children.
But it was his pledge to break up tech giants where necessary that was the most eye-catching announcement.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The scale of the largest companies is rightly the subject of scrutiny. We should take seriously the calls to break them up if it is in the public interest,” he said.
City A.M. says the comments “will pile more pressure on firms such as Facebook, which have been hit with growing criticism amid safety concerns and the use of customer data”.
The social network, which celebrated its 15th birthday this week, has come under intense scrutiny over its use of user data following the Cambridge Analytica scandal and its failure to tackle “fake news” in the run up to elections.
Its share price has suffered amid growing calls for greater regulatory control in both Europe and the US.
In an interview with the BBC, Watson cited Facebook’s purchase of Instagram as an example of a merger that concentrated user data in a dangerous way, adding that the UK’s “competition laws are not fit for the age of big data”.
While his proposal is likely to be warmly received by digital rights campaigners, it may prove difficult to put into practice.
Reuters reports that Watson “did not set out in detail how a British regulator might attempt to break up some of the most powerful companies in the world, almost all of which are based outside the United Kingdom”.
The government is set to publish its own White Paper later this month on online harms that will look at how social media and the internet could be regulated in the face of fake news, bullying, child abuse and other digital harms.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Social media: How 'content' replaced friendship
Feature Facebook has shifted from connecting with friends to competing with entertainment companies
-
Google ruled a monopoly over ad tech dominance
Speed Read Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed the ruling as a 'landmark victory in the ongoing fight to stop Google from monopolizing the digital public square'
-
Meta on trial: What will become of Mark Zuckerberg's social media empire?
Today's Big Question Despite the CEO's attempt to ingratiate himself with Trump, Meta is on trial, accused by the U.S. government of breaking antitrust law
-
What does an ex-executive's new memoir reveal about Meta's free speech pivot?
Today's Big Question 'Careless People' says Facebook was ready to do China censorship
-
What's Mark Zuckerberg's net worth?
In Depth The Meta magnate's products are a part of billions of lives
-
Is 'AI slop' breaking the internet?
In The Spotlight 'Low-quality, inauthentic, or inaccurate' content is taking over social media and distorting search engine results
-
'Mind-boggling': how big a breakthrough is Google's latest quantum computing success?
Today's Big Question Questions remain over when and how quantum computing can have real-world applications
-
DOJ seeks breakup of Google, Chrome
Speed Read The Justice Department aims to force Google to sell off Chrome and make other changes to rectify its illegal search monopoly