If Democrats want to fight voter suppression, they should pay for people to get IDs
Republicans are creating Jim Crow Lite. If Democrats can't beat them, they'll have to find novel ways to get out the vote.
Here's an amazing fact: Candidates and outside groups spent $117 million on the 2014 Senate race in North Carolina alone. Eight Senate races cleared the $50 million mark, a sum that would have about covered an entire presidential race in 1996. Much of that came from the shadowy super PACs of conservatives, but a great deal also came from wealthy liberals, particularly environmentalists.
Green-minded gazillionaire Tom Steyer personally dropped $57 million on the 2014 midterms, as part of a coalition of environmental groups that spent $85 million in total, according to The New York Times. While the effort may have helped environmental groups build a nexus of "climate voters" for future elections, it didn't help Democrats get elected. People have given Steyer a lot of grief for wasting that money, though I would cut him some slack for trying and failing rather than sitting the election out.
But with all that cash in play, I have another suggestion for wealthy liberals who want to mobilize the liberal electorate: pay people's poll taxes.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Republicans have implemented a raft of voter suppression measures in states they control, with the idea of discouraging voting among Democratic-leaning constituencies. It works quite well. The measures include disenfranchising felons, banning same-day registration, reducing voting hours, limiting early voting, and requiring identification to cast a ballot.
The latter is a straightforward revival of the poll tax, a Jim Crow–era fee that had to be paid to vote, the point being to deny the franchise to the (largely black) poor. For voters who don't have ID (especially a photo version), acquiring one is expensive. Indeed, it is more expensive than the poll taxes from the Jim Crow days.
Of course, the best way to counteract voter ID laws is to either strike them down in the courts or ban them in state legislatures. Such laws are clearly unconstitutional — really, there's a whole constitutional amendment dedicated solely to banning poll taxes — and Democrats should do their utmost not to confer any legitimacy on them.
But if these laws continue to stand the next time a national election rolls around, then wealthy liberals ought to consider conducting voter registration drives in states with expensive voter ID requirements and paying the fees for people who don't have the required ID. It would directly help people exercise their right to vote.
Any such operation would have to be nonpartisan. Otherwise opponents could accuse liberals of vote-buying. But if these drives mostly help Democrats, that's only because the poll taxes are targeting them in the first place.
At any rate, liberals shouldn't worry too much about the ethics. The American electoral system has arguably never been more corrupt. As Steve Randy Waldman has written, the quiet corruption that permeates American society today is in many ways worse than explicit graft:
In other words, the system is already rigged. Conservatives have only made it worse by pushing through Jim Crow Lite policies. Sometimes, if you can't beat them, you have to join them.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Is the Gaza war tearing U.S. campuses apart?
Today's Big Question Protests at Columbia University, other institutions, pit free speech against student safety
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
DOJ settles with Nassar victims for $138M
Speed Read The settlement includes 139 sexual abuse victims of the former USA Gymnastics doctor
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
14 recent scientific breakthroughs
In Depth From photos of the infant universe to an energy advancement that could save the planet
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published