3 things Democrats should do during the lame duck session
Ignore the predictable howls from the right. It's time Democrats started playing to win.


The 2014 midterms are over, but due to a bizarre hitch in the American constitutional system, the old Congress still gets one more chance to make laws before the newly elected one takes office in January. It's called the lame duck session, and it began yesterday.
House Democrats will almost certainly have nothing to do. But the rest of the party should take advantage of this time to undertake a few special actions. Let me go through them in turn, then explain why they're justified.
First, the Senate should confirm as many Democratic nominees as possible to empty positions in the federal judiciary and the executive branch. Recall that a year ago Senate Democrats reformed the filibuster on these nominations, reducing the number of votes needed to break a filibuster to 50, from 60. But breaking a filibuster may still take many hours of floor time, which means a mere handful could eat up the entire lame duck. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) shouldn't hesitate to fully abolish filibusters on these nominees, and allow them to be voted through with all speed.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Second, Democrats should make public a long-awaited Senate report on the torture committed by the Central Intelligence Agency during the Bush era. The major conclusions are reportedly going to be released this month, but if any key facts or findings are missing, then outgoing Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.), possibly the Senate's most forceful champion of civil liberties, should read them into the congressional record. The American people deserve to see this report, and ideally some accountability for the war crimes described therein.
Third, both in the lame duck and beyond, President Obama should use the full extent of his executive authority to fiddle around the edges of domestic policy. One logical step would be to pardon the so-called DREAMers, immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as young children.
These moves are sure to stir outrage on the right. Witness the response to Obama announcing Monday his support for reclassifying internet service providers as telecommunication services — in effect, supporting net neutrality, the idea that the government and internet service providers should not discriminate against or favor certain sites.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) brayed that net neutrality is "ObamaCare for the internet," a nonsensical position that nevertheless led folks like Christopher Mims to lament that the concept is now a partisan one. Other objections to Obama's use of executive power comes from procedural moderates who think the lame duck shouldn't be used for any substantitve policy, because the new Congress has more legitimacy.
In a different age those objections may have been germane. But not anymore. American politics is now a zero-sum will-to-power contest, and to play by the old rules of backslapping comity is to cede the game to the other side. From holding the world's economy hostage to shutting down the government, Republicans almost never miss a chance to tear up long-established norms. Just last week, Jim Geraghty at National Review was mulling strategies to straight-up steal the presidency for Republicans in 2016. These are the nihilists Democrats are supposed to placate?
For the next two years, Obama needs to ignore the predictable Republican howls and forcefully implement his favored policies. He needs to play to win, using any legal means at his disposal. Rest assured, when the tables are turned, Republicans will do exactly the same thing.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published