The Democrats' focus on income inequality probably helped... Republicans
The Obama economy has mostly helped the rich. They repaid him by voting for the other party.


A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
The economy was the top issue in the 2014 midterms, as it often is in American elections, according to exit polls.
And you might think that would have helped Democrats. On the one hand, the U.S. economy has rebounded significantly in recent years, with the stock market on a steady upward climb over Obama's five-plus years in office. The economy has expanded, unemployment has fallen, and many other important indicators are up too, as this chart from The Wall Street Journal shows:
Certainly the U.S. has recovered from the Great Recession much quicker than Europe, especially on the metric most relevant for voters, employment:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On the other hand, stagnant wages, the sharp widening of the wealth gap, and the subpar job participation rate should play to the Democrats' strength and political narrative.
Aren't Republicans the party focused on tax cuts for the wealthy "job creators," disparaging the 47 percent of low-earning "takers," taking Donald Trump seriously, and defending business? For Pete's sake, Republican Senator-elect David Purdue bragged about outsourcing American jobs abroad. Democrats are for reducing income inequality and making people pay their "fair share."
It turns out that the voters who turned up on Tuesday are mostly just mad about the economy, and they blame Obama, according to the exit polls. The economy was the top concern for 45 percent of voters. About two-thirds say they believe the economy is flat-lining or getting worse.
Almost half of voters said they and their family haven't seen their finances improve in the past few years and a quarter say they are economically worse off. These voters checked their ballots for Republicans by a 2-to-1 margin, The Associated Press reports. Voters were as disillusioned with congressional Republicans as they were with Obama, and almost two-thirds agreed with Democrats that the U.S. economic system favors the rich — but many of them voted for Republicans anyway.
Democrats did win 55 percent of people whose families earned less than $50,000, but those voters made up only 36 percent of Tuesday's electorate — much smaller than their share of the population. Republicans, meanwhile, won 54 percent of people from households earning $50,000 to $99,000, and 57 percent of those making $100,000 and up.
In other words, Democrats helped convince a big majority of people that the economic system is stacked against them — Kentucky, for example, voted to both raise the minimum wage and send Sen. Mitch McConnell (R) back to Washington — but failed to get enough of those hit hardest by that system to come out and vote. Maybe the lower-earners were busy working on election day, or maybe they were depressed by their position in our stratified economy.
The corollary, of course, is that the voters who gained the most in the Obama economy voted overwhelmingly to make sure he's a lame duck. Maybe Democrats should have talked more about the booming stock market.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Peter Weber is a senior editor at TheWeek.com, and has handled the editorial night shift since the website launched in 2008. A graduate of Northwestern University, Peter has worked at Facts on File and The New York Times Magazine. He speaks Spanish and Italian and plays bass and rhythm cello in an Austin rock band. Follow him on Twitter.
-
Biden's first rodeo
cartoons
By The Week Staff Published
-
Biden's stumble
Cartoons
By The Week Staff Published
-
The daily gossip: Travis Kelce chats about Taylor Swift's Chiefs game visit, Hollywood writers thrilled with details of new contract as strike ends, and more
The daily gossip: September 27, 2023
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
Trump surrenders in Georgia election subversion case
Speed Read
By Catherine Garcia Published
-
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries chosen to succeed Pelosi as leader of House Democrats
Speed Read
By Brigid Kennedy Published
-
GOP leader Kevin McCarthy's bid for House speaker may really be in peril
Speed Read
By Peter Weber Published
-
Are China's protests a real threat for Beijing?
opinion The sharpest opinions on the debate from around the web
By Harold Maass Published
-
Who is Nick Fuentes, the white nationalist who dined with Trump and Kanye?
Speed Read From Charlottesville to Mar-a-Lago in just five years
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Jury convicts Oath Keepers Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs of seditious conspiracy in landmark Jan. 6 verdict
Speed Read
By Peter Weber Published
-
A look at the White House's festive and homey holiday decor
Speed Read
By Brigid Kennedy Published
-
Bob Iger addresses 'Don't Say Gay' bill, says inclusion is part of Disney's values
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published