The Democrats' focus on income inequality probably helped... Republicans
The Obama economy has mostly helped the rich. They repaid him by voting for the other party.
The economy was the top issue in the 2014 midterms, as it often is in American elections, according to exit polls.
And you might think that would have helped Democrats. On the one hand, the U.S. economy has rebounded significantly in recent years, with the stock market on a steady upward climb over Obama's five-plus years in office. The economy has expanded, unemployment has fallen, and many other important indicators are up too, as this chart from The Wall Street Journal shows:
Certainly the U.S. has recovered from the Great Recession much quicker than Europe, especially on the metric most relevant for voters, employment:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On the other hand, stagnant wages, the sharp widening of the wealth gap, and the subpar job participation rate should play to the Democrats' strength and political narrative.
Aren't Republicans the party focused on tax cuts for the wealthy "job creators," disparaging the 47 percent of low-earning "takers," taking Donald Trump seriously, and defending business? For Pete's sake, Republican Senator-elect David Purdue bragged about outsourcing American jobs abroad. Democrats are for reducing income inequality and making people pay their "fair share."
It turns out that the voters who turned up on Tuesday are mostly just mad about the economy, and they blame Obama, according to the exit polls. The economy was the top concern for 45 percent of voters. About two-thirds say they believe the economy is flat-lining or getting worse.
Almost half of voters said they and their family haven't seen their finances improve in the past few years and a quarter say they are economically worse off. These voters checked their ballots for Republicans by a 2-to-1 margin, The Associated Press reports. Voters were as disillusioned with congressional Republicans as they were with Obama, and almost two-thirds agreed with Democrats that the U.S. economic system favors the rich — but many of them voted for Republicans anyway.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Democrats did win 55 percent of people whose families earned less than $50,000, but those voters made up only 36 percent of Tuesday's electorate — much smaller than their share of the population. Republicans, meanwhile, won 54 percent of people from households earning $50,000 to $99,000, and 57 percent of those making $100,000 and up.
In other words, Democrats helped convince a big majority of people that the economic system is stacked against them — Kentucky, for example, voted to both raise the minimum wage and send Sen. Mitch McConnell (R) back to Washington — but failed to get enough of those hit hardest by that system to come out and vote. Maybe the lower-earners were busy working on election day, or maybe they were depressed by their position in our stratified economy.
The corollary, of course, is that the voters who gained the most in the Obama economy voted overwhelmingly to make sure he's a lame duck. Maybe Democrats should have talked more about the booming stock market.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Today's political cartoons - October 1, 2024
Cartoons Tuesday's cartoons - the season of changing colours, a brief pause, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The row over UK maternity pay
Talking Point Tory leadership hopeful Kemi Badenoch implied that taxpayer-funded benefit was 'excessive' and called for 'greater responsibility'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The best places for a last-minute sunny autumn break
The Week Recommends Escape the chilly weather at these sun-drenched destinations
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published