The case for voting (even if America is a corrupt plutocracy rigged by the rich)
Voting won't solve all our problems. But it's an important first step.
With the approach of the 2014 midterms, perhaps the least consequential American election season in a generation, it's worth asking a perennial question: Should you even bother to vote?
Many people have basically given up on the democratic project, arguing that the American system is completely rigged by the rich and that nobody on the ballot truly represents their interests.
There's a lot of truth to this view. America is teetering toward plutocracy because the rich have schmoozed and donated their way to a politically favorable environment in which there are no options for expropriating 1 percenters for badly needed expansions of social insurance. No matter who wins the upcoming election, that won't change.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But voting is still worth doing.
Just look at the Democratic Party's increasingly desperate attempts to hold on to the Senate. They're working hard and spending gobs of money to try and get African-Americans to vote in Georgia, North Carolina, and elsewhere, because high turnout could be the difference between the status quo and a Senate led by Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), one of the biggest shills for moneyed interests in Washington:
Now, electing Democrats in those states won't necessarily improve things. After all, there are different types of Democrats. (Colorado's Mark Udall, for example, is worth a vote, while New York's Andrew Cuomo is not.) Hell, vote for a doomed protest candidate if you want. If the party hacks don't make a good case for themselves, then a protest vote is a strong signal that there are electoral veins to be mined by a challenger or third party.
Still, we know for a fact that low-turnout elections dominated by the enraged white paranoiacs of the Fox News set will definitely keep power in the hands of the rich. If America had a turnout rate of 100 percent, our political situation would look very different than it does now.
Voting in itself won't protect your rights or secure beneficial policies. But it is a key first step to getting there. As the British politician and activist Tony Benn once said, "I think democracy is the most revolutionary idea in the world. Far more revolutionary than socialist ideas or anybody else's ideas — because if you have power, you use it to meet the needs of you and your community."
He once expounded on these ideas in an interview with The Guardian discussing the Putney Debates, a 1647 discussion about a new English constitution and a key development in the history of Western democracy:
Benn was no starry-eyed dreamer — indeed, he openly questioned whether Britain or America were even worthy of the title "democracy." But as he also says, this is a fight that every generation has to fight. And the simple act of voting has to be part of it.
Look no further than Republican attempts across the country to disenfranchise voters and suppress Democratic efforts to register and organize black and brown voters. The fact that the party of organized money thinks the right to vote is worth taking away says that it must be worth quite a lot.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
How accurate are political polls?
The Explainer And how much should you read into figures ahead of the 2024 election?
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
5 insightful podcasts you may have missed this summer
The Week Recommends A few podcast veterans and a number binge-worthy newcomers created an entertaining summer for podcast listeners
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Code-switching: the origins, purpose and pitfalls
The Explainer Balancing your identity and respectability politics sometimes means taking on a different tone or behavior to fit in
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published