The liberal media is more fractured than you think
A National Journal article accuses progressive bloggers of mindlessly toeing the administration's line. Nothing could be further from the truth.


Last week, National Journal writer James Oliphant had a roundly mocked piece about liberal-leaning journalists who allegedly parrot the Obama administration's talking points. To give you a taste, the article boasted the subtitle, "This administration enjoys an advantage afforded no other: A partisan media that has its back, minute-by-minute." Oliphant went on to list all those who carried water for the White House on the latest "news" surrounding Benghazi:
[Press secretary Jay Carney] had The New Republic's Brian Beutler dismissing Benghazi as "nonsense." He had Slate's David Weigel, along with The Washington Post's Plum Line blog, debunking any claim that the new email was a "smoking gun." Media Matters for America labeled Benghazi a "hoax." Salon wrote that the GOP had a "demented Benghazi disease." [National Journal]
There are several gaping problems with this analysis. First, Dave Weigel is no liberal, and he doesn't attend the White House briefing sessions as Oliphant implies. Second, Oliphant doesn't even consider the possibility that these liberals could, in fact, be right about Benghazi. (Is the truth partisan, James?)
But most of all, he completely misses the actual splits between leftists and the Obama administration, as well as within the lefty media ecosystem itself. They really do exist!
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Here is a rough list of the biggest issues that divide the Left in the age of Obama: Due-process-free drone strikes, especially on a 16-year-old American citizen; warrantless dragnet surveillance; total lack of accountability for both the CIA torture program and the spy agency's blatant attempts to undermine the democratic oversight of same; the colossal failure of HAMP, which was supposed to help struggling homeowners; the JPMorgan robo-signing scandal and a dozen other examples of grotesque financial sector malfeasance that have gone virtually unpunished; the Keystone XL pipeline; and, to a lesser extent, austerity at a time of deep economic insecurity.
On all these issues, the presidential line has differed from traditional lefty principles, sometimes shockingly so. Of course, there are plenty of left-leaning hacks who will reflexively defend the president no matter what. But there are plenty of others who have vociferously complained about his policies.
And these disputes aren't hard to uncover! Just scroll through Glenn Greenwald's Twitter feed for about five minutes for a start.
This is the problem with classic Beltway "analysis": It's completely devoid of principle and facts. Like his colleague Ron Fournier (who was beside himself with glee trumpeting this story), Oliphant obviously has no idea what lefties actually care about, or how liberal news organizations make decisions. Instead, politics has a left side and a right side, the content of each being entirely irrelevant because The Truth is to be found precisely between them. Therefore, if people are supporting President Obama on any issue, that means they're partisan hacks.
It makes no difference that the right-wing line on Benghazi is actually a crock. The fact that Oliphant can't say this for fear of sounding partisan is one of the prime ways that fetishizing nonpartisanship as an end in itself poisons one's mind and one's journalism.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Book reviews: ‘Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America’ and ‘How to End a Story: Collected Diaries, 1978–1998’
Feature A political ‘witch hunt’ and Helen Garner’s journal entries
By The Week US Published
-
The backlash against ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli filter
The Explainer The studio's charming style has become part of a nebulous social media trend
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Why are student loan borrowers falling behind on payments?
Today's Big Question Delinquencies surge as the Trump administration upends the program
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published