Do Americans really prioritize security over freedom?
CNN's Jake Tapper says yes. The evidence says no.

Jake Tapper of CNN raised eyebrows recently by claiming that "the American people, honestly, want security over freedom."
That would seem to be a big departure from the ideals of, say, Benjamin Franklin, who wrote that "those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
And is Tapper's claim even true? Do the American people prioritize security over freedom? The most recent evidence doesn't support Tapper's claim.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Since the 9/11 attacks, Gallup has periodically conducted polls on the question of whether or not the government should violate civil liberties in order to take steps to prevent terrorism.
In the most recent poll, in August 2011, 71 percent of respondents said that they thought the government should only take steps that do not violate civil liberties, while just 25 percent thought the government should take any steps necessary, even if that means violating civil liberties.
Even in January 2002, just a few months after the 9/11 attacks, only 49 percent of Americans thought the government should take any steps necessary. But over the last decade, every time Gallup has asked the question, a majority have chosen protecting civil liberties over enhanced security.
Other polls have shown similar results.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
A Pew poll in August of this year found that 47 percent thought the government had gone too far in restricting civil liberties compared to 35 percent who thought the government had not gone far enough to protect the country. In 2010, 58 percent thought the government had not gone far enough, with just 27 percent saying it had gone too far.
And a Quinnipiac poll in July of this year found that 45 percent thought the government had gone too far in restricting civil liberties, compared to 40 percent who thought the government had not gone far enough to protect the country. This was a major shift from 2010, when Quinnipiac asked the same question and found that 25 percent thought the government had gone too far, while 63 thought it had not gone far enough.
The most recent polls which, remember, came during a rash of revelations about invasive NSA domestic spying practices, point to the fact that Americans are getting less hawkish about national security, and want more freedom, not more security measures.
John Aziz is the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also an associate editor at Pieria.co.uk. Previously his work has appeared on Business Insider, Zero Hedge, and Noahpinion.
-
'The winners and losers of AI may not be where we expect'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Shingles vaccine cuts dementia risk, study finds
Speed Read Getting vaccinated appears to significantly reduce the chances of developing Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Judge ends Eric Adams case, Trump leverage
Speed Read Federal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams were dismissed, as requested by Trump's Justice Department
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published