Rice and Power: Obama’s new interventionists
The president named U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice as his national security adviser; Samantha Power will become the new U.N. Ambassador.
“Revenge is a dish best served cold. Except when it’s best served hot,” said Jeffrey Goldberg in Bloomberg.com. President Obama named U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice as his national security adviser last week—just a few months after Senate Republicans blamed her for “misleading the public” about the Benghazi attacks and forced her to withdraw from consideration as secretary of state. Rice’s new job requires no Senate confirmation, and brings her into “the innermost ring of power,” with a direct line to Obama on foreign-policy and defense issues. Giving such a critical job to a proven liar like Rice is an act of sheer “defiance,” said David Limbaugh in WashingtonExaminer.com. Worse yet, Obama has appointed as Rice’s replacement at the U.N. the “equally disturbing” Samantha Power—a leftist who has urged America to issue a “mea culpa” for its past crimes abroad. And so Obama’s “apology tour” continues.
On the contrary, said Doyle McManus in the Los Angeles Times. Obama has just signaled that he “wants to play offense, not defense.” Both Rice and Power are humanitarian interventionists who will push Obama to adopt a more “pugnacious” stance abroad in defense of human rights. Rice has publicly spoken about how “haunted” she was by America’s inaction over the Rwandan genocide in 1994; Power came to believe in U.S. intervention as a journalist covering the Bosnian war. Together, the pair convinced Obama to commit U.S. aid to Libyan rebels to prevent another genocide. Now the focus will turn to Syria, where at least 80,000 people have died in the civil war. Having spent his first term trying to recast America’s image in the world, Obama could now be “ready to throw a few elbows.”
Not likely, said Max Fisher in WashingtonPost.com. Rice and Power may be interventionists, but they’re also big proponents of acting through international institutions such as the U.N. Security Council and NATO. Neither organization has any appetite for a major military operation in Syria. Even if Rice and Power do push Obama to intervene there unilaterally, he’s already overruled much more senior officials making that same recommendation, including former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and CIA chief David Petraeus. Obama considers Rice and Power personal friends, and trusts them implicitly. But he’s convinced there are no good options in Syria—and they’re not going to change his mind.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The FDA plans to embrace AI agencywide
In the Spotlight Rumors are swirling about a bespoke AI chatbot being developed for the FDA by OpenAI
-
Digital consent: Law targets deepfake and revenge porn
Feature The Senate has passed a new bill that will make it a crime to share explicit AI-generated images of minors and adults without consent
-
Will Republicans tax the rich?
Today's Big Question Trump is waffling on the possibility of taxing wealthy earners
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy