Issue of the week: Bloomberg’s spying scandal
Last week, we learned that for years Bloomberg reporters have been monitoring how subscribers use their Bloomberg terminals.
Move aside, News Corp., said Adam Penenberg in PandoDaily.com. Now it’s media giant Bloomberg’s turn to be embroiled in a spying scandal. Last week, we learned that for years Bloomberg reporters have been monitoring how subscribers use their Bloomberg terminals, the ubiquitous computer system financial players rely on to “execute trades with vast sums of money at stake.” All the reporters had to do was “hit the ‘Z’ function” to see which employees of Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase—or government officials like Tim Geithner and Ben Bernanke—had logged on, and even how often “they checked out corporate bond trades or equities indices.” These intrusions allowed Bloomberg reporters to tell when a beleaguered trader or partner “had gone silent on the terminal”—perhaps because he’d been fired.
“The error is inexcusable,” said editor-in-chief Matthew Winkler in Bloomberg.com. “Our reporters should not have access to any data considered proprietary,” and last month we changed our system so they don’t. But it’s important to point out what limited data our reporters had access to. They could see a user’s login history, helpdesk inquiries, and some aggregate user function data—“akin to being able to see how many times someone used Microsoft Word vs. Excel.” But they never had access to clients’ messages, and they “couldn’t see the stories that clients were reading or the securities clients might be looking at.” Still, as we tell our reporters and editors, the mere appearance of impropriety is enough to damage a reputation, and we apologize.
It’s not that easy, said Zachary M. Seward in Qz.com. “At Bloomberg, omniscience is a feature, not a bug.” Monitoring terminal users’ data has long been part of an obsession with controlling and using all available data at the company, where “stalking is simply part of the culture.” Employees can keep tabs on each other, checking when someone scans—or “badges”—out of an office, and management is said to log every keystroke to track staff and outside customers. That Bloomberg culture explains how hundreds of people at the company could spy on customers “without batting an eye.” In fact, this suddenly “inexcusable” practice highlights a key to Bloomberg’s phenomenal success. “Data comes into the company—as much as possible, from wherever possible—but it doesn’t leave because, at Bloomberg, information is money.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This scandal won’t stop that flow of cash, said Kevin Roose in NYMag.com. Subscriptions for terminals make up roughly 80 percent of Bloomberg LP’s revenues, which came to $7.9 billion last year. But even if it were shown that reporters had been snooping into terminal data “with a wanton disregard for client privacy,” clients wouldn’t flee. Wall Street simply wouldn’t function without the Bloomberg terminals, which serve as “an entire information ecosystem, into which a generation of Wall Street traders have wrapped their habits and routines.” Clients may stomp, pout, and renegotiate their contracts, but once “a few pro forma steps are taken to put clients at ease, it will be back to business as usual for Bloomberg.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The worst baseball franchises of the Wild Card era
The Explainer These teams have consistently failed to find a winning formula
By David Faris Published
-
Canadian takeover bid for Japan's 7-Eleven could change how the Asian country does business
In the Spotlight Would a foreign company upend konbini culture?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why are older workers staying on the job?
Today's Big Question And what does it mean for younger workers?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Issue of the week: Do high-speed traders rig the market?
feature Wall Street is abuzz over high-frequency trading.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: How Yellen spooked the markets
feature At her first press conference, the new Federal Reserve chair made the mistake of indicating when the Fed would raise interest rates.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Stop calling women ‘bossy’
feature Let’s ban “She’s bossy.” Instead, let’s try, “She has executive leadership skills.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: GM’s recall disaster
feature Mary Barra is facing “her first big test” since she took over as GM’s new CEO in January: a recall of more than 1.6 million vehicles.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Who gets Fannie’s and Freddie’s profits?
feature Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s shareholders want their money back.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Comcast buying Time Warner Cable
feature Has Comcast won the cable wars?
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: AOL’s million-dollar babies
feature AOL’s “gaffe-prone” CEO, Tim Armstrong, “got in some hot water” last week.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Why Google unloaded Motorola
feature Three years after shelling out $12.5 billion for Motorola, Google announced its sale to Lenovo Group for $2.9 billion.
By The Week Staff Last updated