Guantánamo: Why is it still open?
Four years ago, Barack Obama vowed to close the “Orwellian” prison at Guantánamo Bay.
Four years ago, said The Economist in an editorial, Barack Obama vowed to close the “Orwellian” prison at Guantánamo Bay. Last week, amid a mass hunger strike involving at least 100 of the 166 detainees, he revived his call to close it. Guantánamo is “contrary to who we are, it is contrary to our interests,” said Obama, suggesting that if it weren’t for Congress blocking him, he would have shut this disgraceful gulag down long ago. What a “cop-out,” said Andrew O’Hehir in Salon.com. The reality is that Obama just abandoned Guantánamo once Republicans started attacking him as “a terrorist-coddling pantywaist.” Now his administration may be violating international law by force-feeding dozens of the striking prisoners, stuffing a greased tube down their noses and throats until they gag and bleed. If Obama now feels shame over “this national embarrassment,” he should: He left those men at Guantánamo out of “political cowardice.”
Now Obama wants to rewrite history, said The Wall Street Journal. He once did advocate closing Guantánamo, but “as a president, he has adopted nearly all of President Bush’s laws-of-war paradigm in practice.” At least 136 detainees are being held under his orders, even though 86 have been cleared for release to jails in their home countries—mostly to Yemen. Why? Because Obama knows some will escape if sent back to unstable, corrupt countries, and rejoin “dozens of other former Guantánamo detainees” who’ve rejoined terrorist organizations. Who cares if jihadists “starve their way to the Great Orgy in the Sky?” asked Andrew C. McCarthy in NationalReview.com. The Guantánamo guards should “deliver the prisoners a heaping halal turkey dinner every day—on videotape. If they choose not to eat it, that’s on them.”
“The criticism of Obama is not entirely fair,” said the Chicago Tribune. Obama did try to transfer the detainees to a federal supermax prison in Illinois, but Congress passed a law barring their transfer to U.S. soil. “To protect Americans from terrorism,” he imposed the moratorium on Yemen releases after the 2009 arrest of a Yemen-trained “underwear bomber.” The reality is that as long as we’re at war with al Qaida, some prisoners will remain at Guantánamo. Obama’s best option is to minimize that number, by negotiating with foreign governments to take as many as we can send elsewhere. It’s hardly ideal, “but an incomplete solution is better than none at all.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Political cartoons for October 26Cartoons Sunday’s editorial cartoons include Young Republicans group chat, Louvre robbery, and more
-
Why Britain is struggling to stop the ransomware cyberattacksThe Explainer New business models have greatly lowered barriers to entry for criminal hackers
-
Greene’s rebellion: a Maga hardliner turns against TrumpIn the Spotlight The Georgia congresswoman’s independent streak has ‘not gone unnoticed’ by the president
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to goThe Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'