Guantánamo: Why is it still open?
Four years ago, Barack Obama vowed to close the “Orwellian” prison at Guantánamo Bay.
Four years ago, said The Economist in an editorial, Barack Obama vowed to close the “Orwellian” prison at Guantánamo Bay. Last week, amid a mass hunger strike involving at least 100 of the 166 detainees, he revived his call to close it. Guantánamo is “contrary to who we are, it is contrary to our interests,” said Obama, suggesting that if it weren’t for Congress blocking him, he would have shut this disgraceful gulag down long ago. What a “cop-out,” said Andrew O’Hehir in Salon.com. The reality is that Obama just abandoned Guantánamo once Republicans started attacking him as “a terrorist-coddling pantywaist.” Now his administration may be violating international law by force-feeding dozens of the striking prisoners, stuffing a greased tube down their noses and throats until they gag and bleed. If Obama now feels shame over “this national embarrassment,” he should: He left those men at Guantánamo out of “political cowardice.”
Now Obama wants to rewrite history, said The Wall Street Journal. He once did advocate closing Guantánamo, but “as a president, he has adopted nearly all of President Bush’s laws-of-war paradigm in practice.” At least 136 detainees are being held under his orders, even though 86 have been cleared for release to jails in their home countries—mostly to Yemen. Why? Because Obama knows some will escape if sent back to unstable, corrupt countries, and rejoin “dozens of other former Guantánamo detainees” who’ve rejoined terrorist organizations. Who cares if jihadists “starve their way to the Great Orgy in the Sky?” asked Andrew C. McCarthy in NationalReview.com. The Guantánamo guards should “deliver the prisoners a heaping halal turkey dinner every day—on videotape. If they choose not to eat it, that’s on them.”
“The criticism of Obama is not entirely fair,” said the Chicago Tribune. Obama did try to transfer the detainees to a federal supermax prison in Illinois, but Congress passed a law barring their transfer to U.S. soil. “To protect Americans from terrorism,” he imposed the moratorium on Yemen releases after the 2009 arrest of a Yemen-trained “underwear bomber.” The reality is that as long as we’re at war with al Qaida, some prisoners will remain at Guantánamo. Obama’s best option is to minimize that number, by negotiating with foreign governments to take as many as we can send elsewhere. It’s hardly ideal, “but an incomplete solution is better than none at all.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Rikers Island will no longer be under New York City's control
The Explainer A 'remediation manager' has been appointed to run the infamous jail
-
California mulls pulling health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of their immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise
-
Is Apple breaking up with Google?
Today's Big Question Google is the default search engine in the Safari browser. The emergence of artificial intelligence could change that.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy