Why Rand Paul's filibuster was a publicity stunt — and a wasted opportunity

The senator's talkathon failed to make the White House come clean about drone strikes

Rand Paul fans
(Image credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty)

It was a hell of a show. No doubt about that. Twelve hours and 52 minutes. And Rand Paul, the junior senator from Kentucky, was not alone in his marathon filibuster. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined in, reading from Henry V and showing off the oratorical skills that made him an elite Supreme Court advocate. Cruz was so moved that he told Paul that Jimmy Stewart would surely be smiling down on the senator's principled stand. And the praise was not confined to Cruz. Paul's colleagues and some of the smartest members of the media hopped on board, too. (Ezra Klein praised Paul’s lecture as an example of "the highest purpose of the filibuster.")

And it was done for what seemed like an obviously wonderful cause: To think, the president of the United States would not guarantee that he would not use a drone against an American citizen on U.S. soil.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Jeb Golinkin is an attorney from Houston, Texas. You can follow him on twitter @jgolinkin.