Obama’s drone rationale
A Justice Department memo leaked this week has revealed the legal argument for White House drone strikes abroad.
A Justice Department memo leaked this week has revealed the legal rationale for White House drone strikes abroad, stating that the president has authority to order targeted assassinations of anyone—including U.S. citizens—believed to be associated with al Qaida, even without intelligence linking them to an active plot to attack the U.S. The document presents the U.S.’s controversial drone strike program against al Qaida suspects in Pakistan, Yemen, and other countries as “a lawful act of self-defense,” even when it targets U.S. citizens such as Anwar al-Awlaki.
The White House has previously said targeted assassinations are constitutionally justified when government officials believe a person poses an “imminent threat of violent attack.” But the secret memo, obtained by NBC News, allows for what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” that does not require the U.S. to have “clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future.” Instead, “informed, high-level officials” must determine only that the target has been recently involved in activities that presage a violent attack.
This memo gives Obama the “most extreme power a political leader can seize,” said Glenn Greenwald in Guardian.co.uk. He can legally assassinate anyone accused of ties to al Qaida so long as they’re involved in vague, nonspecific “activities.” This establishes a chilling legal precedent even beyond the Bush-Cheney power grab: that the president can kill whomever he likes “far from any battlefield, with no charges or trial.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What would liberal critics have Obama do? said Saikrishna Prakash in NYTimes.com.He can hardly have a judge on hand to review the real-time targeting decisions of military commanders. We are still at war with al Qaida, and this memo gives a “careful and lawyerly” view of how we fight our own citizens when they fight us. “It is nothing if not exhaustive.”
Hardly, said Jack Shafer in Reuters.com. This document is filled with “squishy language,” failing to define “recently” or “activities” or exactly who the “informed, high-level officials” making decisions are. A separate memo reportedly exists that justifies the process in more explicit terms. The White House should release it. If Obama wants to assassinate U.S. citizens based on “gut feelings,” he ought to be prepared to defend that act.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scottish hospitality shines at these 7 hotels
The Week Recommends Sleep well at these lovely inns across Scotland
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Scientists invent a solid carbon-negative building material
Under the radar Building CO2 into the buildings
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: April 1, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published