What happened
A bipartisan group of senators unveiled a proposal for comprehensive immigration reform this week, setting out a road map for 11 million illegal immigrants to begin a long journey to full citizenship. The plan by the eight senators, who included Republicans John McCain and Marco Rubio and Democrats Chuck Schumer and Robert Menendez, would give undocumented immigrants provisional legal status if they registered with the government, paid a fine, settled their back taxes, and proved they could speak English. They could then join the line for permanent residence, or a “green card,” and thereafter apply for full citizenship. In a provision insisted on by Republicans, permanent-resident status would be available only after the government deployed more border agents and unmanned drones and a special commission deemed the southern U.S. border “fully secured.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
Thanks to an “emerging bipartisan consensus,” immigration reform may finally be possible, said The Washington Post. But requiring illegal immigrants to go to the back of a waiting line for visas means that most wouldn’t get one for a decade or longer, with citizenship even more distant. “As paths to citizenship go, that’s too long,” and a process that requires people to register with the government but wait years for legal status would discourage people from participating. “Demanding an airtight border” is also unrealistic and unnecessary, said the Los Angeles Times. Illegal crossings are already down 80 percent since 2000.
Border crossing has dropped only because of the lousy state of the U.S. economy, said The Wall Street Journal, and it’ll go up once our job creation does. Republicans have to insist on greater border enforcement in the bill to get the “conservative rank and file” on board. And there’s nothing wrong with requiring illegal immigrants to wait years for their papers, said USA Today. Letting them quickly qualify for citizenship would be a “slap in the face to those who played by the rules.”
What the columnists said
Don’t let the support of a few Republican senators fool you, said Alex Pareene in Salon.com. In rural white America, “right-wing nativism” remains a powerful force, and the conservative media is already shouting “amnesty.” There’s no reason to think House Republicans from severely conservative districts will risk infuriating their constituents by voting for any reform package. Nor should they, said Michael Graham in the Boston Herald. Giving amnesty to people who came here illegally to steal American jobs will only produce “more illegal immigration tomorrow.”
It’s true that reform will be hard to sell to the Right, said Robert Costa in NationalReview.com. But Marco Rubio is a “pro at soothing conservatives’ anxiety.” The Cuban-American senator even convinced Rush Limbaugh to tentatively support the Senate proposal this week. His talent for speaking conservatives’ language—and his status as a future presidential contender—“may be the factor ensuring passage of the bill.” Conservatives must ask themselves if they want to “cling to phony bumper sticker slogans like ‘no amnesty,’” said Jennifer Rubin in WashingtonPost.com, or face the reality that responsible immigration reform is critical to attracting Latino voters to the party—and winning elections.
If Obama wants reform, he should stop talking about it, said Ezra Klein, also in WashingtonPost.com. Most Washington Republicans understand the “strategic and substantive reasons for making a deal,” but conservative voters hate “anything overly associated with the Obama administration.” The president has made his speech; now it’s up to Congress. By staying out of the deal-making, Obama will make it “easier for Republicans to stay in.”
-
What will security guarantees for Ukraine look like?Today's Big Question From boots on the ground to economic sanctions, here are the measures that might stop Russia taking another bite out of Ukraine
-
The US Open's controversial 'superstars' doubles formatTalking Point New shortened competition attracts star pairings and bigger audiences to grand slam tennis event
-
Sudoku medium: August 21, 2025The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
Putin’s threat to fracture Ukrainefeature Fears that Russia was building a pretext for an invasion of eastern Ukraine grew, as pro-Kremlin protesters occupied government buildings in three cities.
-
Curbing NSA surveillance
feature The White House said it will propose a broad overhaul of the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program.
-
Downsizing the military
feature A new budget plan for the Pentagon would save hundreds of billions of dollars by taking the military off its post-9/11 war footing.
-
Putin ratchets up pressure on Ukraine
feature Russian President Vladimir Putin put 150,000 troops at the Ukraine border on high alert and cut off $15 billion in financial aid.
-
Ukraine on the brink of civil war
feature Ukraine’s capital was engulfed in flames and violence when hundreds of riot police launched an assault on an anti-government protest camp.
-
Ukraine at the breaking point
feature An alliance of opposition groups vowed protests would continue until President Viktor Yanukovych is removed from power.
-
Dim prospects for Syrian talks
feature A long-awaited Syrian peace conference in Montreux, Switzerland, quickly degenerated into a cross fire of bitter accusations.
-
The fight over jobless benefits
feature A bill to restore federal benefits for the long-term unemployed advanced when six Republican senators voted with Democrats.