Political spending: Why the Super PACs flopped
“Money can’t buy happiness,” and apparently, it can’t buy an election, either.
“Money can’t buy happiness,” said Michael Isikoff in NBCNews.com, and apparently, it can’t buy an election, either. Thanks to the Supreme Court’s controversial decisions to strike down campaign-finance laws in such cases as Citizens United,the recent presidential election was the first in which wealthy contributors and corporations could donate unlimited sums of money to Super PACs—political action committees set up to advocate for candidates and parties. Big checks flooded in, but, it turns out, “the super donors didn’t get much for their money.” The pro–Mitt Romney Super PAC, Restore Our Future, spent $143 million on a losing cause. Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson threw away $20 million on Newt Gingrich’s failed primary campaign, and then another $33 million on Romney’s campaign and nine Republican congressional candidates—eight of whom lost. GOP strategist Karl Rove’s American Crossroads group spent $175.8 million on attack ads this cycle, but only one of the 10 Democrats he targeted lost. All told, said Dan Eggen in The Washington Post, the Super PACs wasted more than $1 billion trying to influence voters. “Never before has so much political money been spent to achieve so little.”
The Super PACs’ failure doesn’t prove that money can’t influence elections, said David Weigel in Slate.com. It only proves that money spent on really “stupid” attack ads doesn’t influence elections. Voters in Ohio, for instance, were bombarded with amateurish cartoons in which caricatures of Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown rubber-stamped supposedly “job killing” legislation while sitting at a desk with an “I Love Taxes” coffee mug. Many other Super PAC attack ads were just as “lazy and patronizing.” There were also far too many of them, said David Horsey in the Los Angeles Times. More than 1 million ads were aired in total, and in Ohio and other crucial swing states, “the colossal spending spree reached a saturation point after which voters simply could not absorb any more negative advertising.”
If you think that means Citizens United doesn’t matter, said Eric Posner in Slate.com, you’re mistaken. When a partisan billionaire like Adelson donates tens of millions to a Republican Super PAC, what he’s really buying is influence over the entire party, including incumbent senators and congressmen who want Adelson’s backing for their own next campaigns. “More insidiously,” Adelson is also potentially influencing Democrats in Congress, who know that if they’re too aggressive in promoting policies Adelson doesn’t like, he might start writing fat checks to whoever runs against them.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Money will always find its way into politics, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. So let’s stop playing Super PAC games, and let donors contribute unlimited amounts directly to candidates. In hindsight, the presidential race was won in the early summer, when the Obama campaign spent more than $100 million in swing states “to portray Mitt Romney as Gordon Gekko without the social conscience.” Romney’s campaign was low on cash after his primary battle, and he was forbidden by law from coordinating with the Super PACs that could have fought back on his behalf. “The real problem this year wasn’t too much campaign spending but too little.” Liberal Chicken Littles said all that spending would make the sky fall, but it didn’t, said George Will in The Washington Post. Voters in swing states were engaged and informed, and the election was hotly contested and highly competitive. “More spending on political advocacy means more voter information and interest,” and that’s always a good thing for our democracy.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'Making a police state out of the liberal university'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
8 looming climate tipping points that imperil our planet
The Explainer New reports detail the thresholds we may be close to crossing
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Try 6 free issues of The Week Junior
Spark your child's curiosity with The Week Junior - the award-winning current affairs magazine for 8-14s.
By The Week Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published