Netanyahu: Trying to influence the U.S. election?
The Israeli prime minister's recent statements seem designed to sway public opinion.
Iran’s nuclear facilities may well be next, said Andrew Sullivan in TheDailyBeast.com, but Benjamin Netanyahu’s first goal is clearly to “blow up the U.S. election.” The Israeli prime minister recently chastised the White House for not setting a firm “red line” for Iran’s nuclear program that would result in a war if crossed. This week Netanyahu doubled down, with two inflammatory appearances on U.S. Sunday talk shows. Using a clumsy football analogy clearly tailored to a U.S. audience, Netanyahu warned that Iran was already in “the last 20 yards” in its drive for a nuclear touchdown, and might be just six months from making a bomb. That bomb, he said pointedly, might wind up in the hands of Iran’s terrorist surrogates, and “the kind of fanaticism you see storming your embassies would have a nuclear weapon.” Netanyahu’s friend, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, has sought to capitalize on the rift, charging that Obama was snubbing the Israeli prime minister and throwing Israel “under the bus.” Never before has an American politician sided with a foreign leader in a conflict with our government, said Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times.A war with Iran would have grave, unpredictable consequences, and plunge our economy back into recession. Obama is right to resist, and he “should indeed set a red line—warning Netanyahu to stop interfering in American elections.”
Netanyahu’s behavior “looks a lot like meddling,” said Jeffrey Goldberg in TheAtlantic.com, but I don’t think his goal is to “tip the election to Mitt Romney.” A veteran of countless campaigns himself, the Israeli leader can read polls as well as anyone, and has resigned himself to the idea that Obama will very likely win a second term. So “why risk alienating” him? He genuinely fears that Obama “won’t actually stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon,” because he’ll decide that the costs of doing so are too great.
So why shouldn’t Netanyahu try to sway American public opinion? said Jay Nordlinger in NationalReview.com. His nation is “facing an existential threat” from Iran, whose leaders have not only vowed to wipe Israel off the map, but are rapidly closing in on the technology that would make another Holocaust possible. Worse, this is “a threat the wider world does not seem all that keen to confront.” As Israelis, we’re used to this, said Danny Danon, deputy speaker of the Israeli Knesset, in the Los Angeles Times. Just prior to the Six Day War, in 1967, Egypt massed troops in the Sinai Peninsula, and signed military cooperation pacts with Syria and Jordan, signaling an imminent invasion. In 1981, the madman Saddam Hussein began building the Osirak nuclear reactor, to make fuel for a future weapon. Both times, the international community urged us “to take a wait-and-see approach.” Netanyahu, a keen student of our history, knows that when it comes to Israel’s “very survival,” we can’t wait for later.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It still isn’t right, or smart, for him to publicly scold a U.S. president, said David Ignatius in WashingtonPost.com. Obama has already stated, unequivocally, that his policy is “to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” and has even instructed his generals to prepare a detailed plan of attack if Iran takes clear steps toward weaponization. But the decision to send U.S. bombers to Iran is Obama’s alone, and “Netanyahu should understand that no country can allow another to impose the conditions under which it will go to war.” It’s just as outrageous, said Eric Lewis in NYTimes.com, that Netanyahu would threaten to strike Iran himself without America’s approval. “To be sure, Israel is a special ally,” but she owes her security to arms, military aid, and political support provided by the U.S. Israel has no more right to attack Iran, and cause untold damage to regional stability and the U.S. economy, than South Korea has to unilaterally attack the mad, nuclear-armed regime in North Korea.
Netanyahu has every right to defend Israel—and to doubt Obama’s “commitment to stopping Iran,” said Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post. Sanctions have done nothing, and indeed, the International Atomic Energy Agency reports that Iran’s nuclear program “is accelerating.” Of course it is. Obama refuses to set any line beyond which Iran must not go, leading every sensible person—including the mullahs in Tehran—to conclude that he’ll “allow Iran to go nuclear.” No wonder Netanyahu now seems panicky. “Not since its birth six decades ago has Israel been so cast adrift by its closest ally.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Book reviews: ‘Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America’ and ‘How to End a Story: Collected Diaries, 1978–1998’
Feature A political ‘witch hunt’ and Helen Garner’s journal entries
By The Week US Published
-
The backlash against ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli filter
The Explainer The studio's charming style has become part of a nebulous social media trend
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Why are student loan borrowers falling behind on payments?
Today's Big Question Delinquencies surge as the Trump administration upends the program
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published