A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
On Sunday, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange made his first public appearance since seeking refuge — and subsequently scoring asylum — in the Ecuadorean embassy in London. Appearing at an open window on the embassy's ground floor, Assange thanked "courageous" Ecuador, accused Britain of wanting to trample the Vienna Convention, and asked President Obama to "do the right thing" — by which Assange meant renouncing the U.S. "witch hunt against WikiLeaks," dissolving "its FBI investigation" of him and his secret-sharing site, and vowing that the U.S. "will not seek to prosecute our staff or our supporters," notably jailed Pfc. Bradley Manning. Assange did not address the sexual assault allegations he faces in Sweden if he steps foot out of the embassy, where London police are waiting to nab him and fulfill Sweden's extradition request. Is Assange using the noble patina of press freedoms to avoid facing justice for alleged sexual crimes, or is he right that the whole exercise is a U.S.-designed trap to get him extradited to America to face charges of espionage and leaking state secrets?
Assange is clearly being persecuted: "Everyone but the willfully blind knows that Assange is the victim of a witch hunt," says Chris Marsden at OpEd News. Sweden is but the "willing accomplice in the imperialist frame-up of Assange," a "filthy enterprise" orchestrated by the U.S. and assisted by Britain. You can bet that the Obama administration has "convened a secret grand jury to draw up charges against Assange," and if the U.S. gets the chance to act, the chief WikiLeaker will likely face the death penalty or life in "the black hole of Guantanamo."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
If anything, the U.S. is going too easy on WikiLeaks: This purported witch hunt doesn't exist, says Jonathon Narvey at The Propagandist. The only warrant for Assange's arrest is from Sweden, and the term "witch hunt" implies "an all-out campaign of harassment, intimidation, and actual arrests of WikiLeaks employees," or at the very least "an irrational, unnaturally obsessive focus" on silencing Assange. If anything, the U.S. "ought to be far more concerned with ensuring WikiLeaks doesn't... put both soldiers and American allies at risk" more than it already has.
But the U.S. really could try to indict Assange: The "witch hunt" rhetoric is probably overblown, but according to newly released Australian diplomatic cables, the U.S. does have "an ongoing criminal investigation against Assange," says Kim Zetter at Wired. At a preliminary hearing against Manning last December, a U.S. prosecutor said there was evidence Assange helped Manning crack a password to access military documents. If the U.S. can prove that, "it would be evidence of a conspiracy," and Assange really could have a whole new extradition fight on his hands.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.