Has Obama gone too soft on welfare?

Romney accuses Obama of dismantling welfare reform by offering states waivers on welfare-to-work requirements. Will the attack hurt Obama, or could it backfire?

President Obama
(Image credit: Edward Linsmier/Getty Images)

The presidential campaign ad wars got even more heated this week, with Mitt Romney accusing President Obama of gutting the bipartisan welfare reform law signed by then-president Bill Clinton in 1996 (see the new ad below). The Obama administration issued a directive last month offering states waivers from the rule that welfare recipients must be working or training for work. Bad move, says Romney, who argues that this will discourage people from seeking the dignity of work, as they kick back and wait for welfare checks. White House spokesman Jay Carney called the charge "blatantly dishonest." Has Romney successfully skewered the president this time?

This ad will backfire on Romney: The trouble with slamming Obama for giving states flexibility on implementing welfare reform, says Sahil Kapur at Talking Points Memo, is that "Romney himself pushed the federal government for a similar policy" when he was governor of Massachusetts. In 2005, he joined 28 other GOP governors to ask Congress for "even more flexibility than Obama has offered." By attacking Obama, Romney's raising the question of whether he has flip-flopped.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up