Tax battle: The Democrats’ risky tactic
Republicans and Democrats in Congress disagree on how to handle the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts.
Democrats are learning to love the “fiscal cliff,” said Steve Kornacki in Salon.com. The Bush-era tax cuts will expire on Dec. 31 unless Congress acts. Republicans want the cuts to be made permanent, while President Obama wants the richest Americans to pay more. The chances of a deal are slim, but Democrats are beginning to realize that “they have the stronger hand.” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said last week that her party might embrace a tactic that begins with letting all the tax cuts expire. That “nuclear option” may in fact be “our best hope” for arriving at sensible compromise, said Bill Keller in The New York Times. It would almost certainly force the Republicans, at the beginning of next year, to join Democrats in retroactively restoring tax cuts for all but the richest 2 percent of Americans—and they wouldn’t have to breach their no-tax pledge to do it, since they’d effectively be cutting taxes. The question is whether Democrats have the sangfroid to “dig in their heels and do nothing.”
Surely they aren’t that foolish, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Letting all the Bush tax cuts expire would suck $400 billion out of taxpayers’ pockets, and that prospect alone would push the economy “close to recession territory.” Voters recognize this as partisan gamesmanship, and they won’t reward Democrats for being “willing to toy with recession to win an election.” That’s why Obama should distance himself from “leftist dead-enders” like Murray, said Michael Medved in TheDailyBeast.com, and instead broker a deal with Republicans to avert “Taxmageddon.” Showing bold leadership to protect taxpayers from fiscal crisis is surely a better electoral strategy than threatening to capsize the economy to “score ideological points.”
But Republicans “don’t seem interested in bargaining,” said the Los Angeles Times. Their solution for the fiscal cliff is to pass partisan bills that cut Democratic priorities in order to fund Republican ones. Now the Democrats are trying to beat them at their own game. The danger here is that lawmakers will “spend the rest of the year posturing” instead of hammering out a deal. Inaction would “impose five months of tax uncertainty” on the nation, said Jac Wilder VerSteeg in the Palm Beach, Fla., Post, slowing our economic growth and risking another bond-rating downgrade. Members of both parties should be running away from the cliff and toward a compromise. “Any who don’t have less sense than lemmings.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Who is actually running DOGE?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House said in a court filing that Elon Musk isn't the official head of Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency task force, raising questions about just who is overseeing DOGE's federal blitzkrieg
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How does the Kennedy Center work?
The Explainer The D.C. institution has become a cultural touchstone. Why did Trump take over?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What are reciprocal tariffs?
The Explainer And will they fix America's trade deficit?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published