The ObamaCare ruling: What happened behind the scenes?
John Roberts' conflict, President Obama's confusion, and more compelling details about the game-changing Supreme Court ruling and its immediate aftermath

After the Supreme Court upheld the centerpiece of President Obama's health care law, the dramatic decision was instantly immortalized in blaring headlines, blog posts, and tweets. A number of related dramas got less attention, however — unfolding across the nation from the Oval Office to Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago to the headquarters of CNN to the courtroom itself. Here, a look at what happened behind the scenes:
1. John Roberts was very uncomfortable
Though the conservative chief justice joined the court's four liberals to uphold the law, he wasn't necessarily thrilled about it. When the black-robed justices first entered the courtroom, the only hint of how Roberts would swing came from the arch-conservative Antonin Scalia, who, "taking his place at the chief justice's right, bowed his head as if in mourning," says Dana Milbank at The Washington Post. When the dissenting judges excoriated the majority for "vast judicial overreaching," Roberts "pursed his lips and stared at the desk in front of him." When the liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg accused the chief justice of curbing Congress' power in a partial dissent, Roberts "turned a pained gaze toward the florets in the ceiling."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. President Obama thought the law had been overturned
CNN and Fox News burst out of the gates with headlines mistakenly stating that the individual mandate — which requires nearly all Americans to purchase insurance or pay a fine — had been struck down. President Obama, watching a bank of four monitors outside the Oval Office, initially believed those inaccurate reports. Obama was "a bit crestfallen and anxious for more detail," says Glenn Thrush at Politico. A minute later White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler informed him that the law had been upheld. (Ruemmler relied on SCOTUSblog, an influential website that was running a live feed of analysis.) "When the reality hit, he padded into the Oval Office, where he embraced Ruemmler and eventually hugged his laconic chief of staff, Jack Lew."
3. Obama's campaign was confused, too
David Axelrod, a senior adviser on Obama's campaign team, also thought the law had been struck down. Axelrod had been "sitting in the office of Obama campaign manager Jim Messina when they read on Twitter what would prove to be an erroneous initial report," says Geneva Sands at The Hill. They saw the incorrect banner headline on CNN, which only seemed to confirm the bad news. Then they heard a big cheer from the staff outside the office, and were totally confused. They finally figured out what had actually happened: "We went outside and all these kids were cheering and crying and hugging," Axelrod told MSNBC. "It really was a reminder of why you do the work."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. CNN was a hot mess
The trouble began when Bill Mears, a CNN producer in the courtroom, jumped the gun before Roberts finished speaking. He relayed incorrect information to reporter Kate Bolduan, who was in front of the cameras outside the court. "Moments after Bolduan spoke, the false story began to metastasize inside the network's online operation," says Michael Hastings at Buzzfeed. CNN anchor John King declared that it was a huge blow to Obama, only to have his colleague Wolf Blitzer call it a huge victory for Obama only minutes later. "Fucking humiliating," an unidentified CNN employee told Hastings. CNN later apologized for the error; Fox News did not.
Sources: Buzzfeed, The Hill, The Huffington Post, Politico, The Washington Post
Read more political coverage at The Week's 2012 Election Center.
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published