Did Obama overshare with Hollywood about the bin Laden raid?
As the White House bends over backwards to help filmmakers, conservatives accuse Obama of spilling secrets so he'll be portrayed as a hero on screen

Though the White House warned that leaking info concerning the fatal raid on Osama bin Laden could pose security risks, it seemingly changed its tune when Hollywood came calling with plans to transform the raid into a movie. According to records obtained by conservative watchdog Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act request, the Obama administration granted Hollywood filmmakers Kathryn Bigelow (director of The Hurt Locker) and screenwriter Mark Boal extraordinary access to officials involved in the bin Laden operation, and let them tour classified CIA facilities, including the mock-up of bin Laden's hideout. Conservatives suspect that the White House was hoping the filmmakers would depict President Obama as bold and decisive in their bin Laden movie, Zero Dark Thirty, in time to boost his re-election effort. House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R-N.Y.) called the administration's decision to leak information "absolutely shocking." Was the White House reckless?
The administration leaked secrets to glorify Obama: Everyone knows Obama wants to "maximize the political advantage to be had from the killing of bin Laden," says Paul Mirengoff at Power Line. But you'd think he'd draw the line at letting people — with the help of Democratic lobbyists — purchase "access to national security officials so they can 'talk out of school.'" Apparently no secrets are safe if leaking them can help in the "glorifying of Obama" in an election year.
"Obama administration ignores its own warnings, opens up to Hollywood on bin Laden raid"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Relax. Bush did the same thing: "This White House is certainly not the first to leak sensitive information with the intention of shaping the media narrative (see Iraq War, the)," says Adam Serwer at Mother Jones. You can't blame Obama for wanting to influence how this story is told, since the killing of bin Laden will be a huge part of his legacy. Still, let's hope the final movie includes the whole truth, including any "inconvenient information" the administration wants downplayed.
"Bin Laden filmmakers got 'unprecedented access' to national security officials"
The Hollywood-White House collaboration fizzled months ago: This isn't the first time someone has complained of a "too-cozy relationship" between the White House and Bigelow, says Andre Tartar at Vulture. The New York Times' Maureen Dowd wrote in August that Team Obama was hoping the bin Laden movie would portray him as "gutsy" for voters. But the movie isn't coming out in October, as first reported, but in December, "well after Election Day." And Bigelow and Boal never did meet with the "mysterious Navy SEAL planner" whose name they were given, so Judicial Watch's document request was all "a lot of trouble for nothing."
"Officials offered Kathryn Bigelow inside access for bin Laden film"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Road trip: New England’s maple syrup season
Feature New England is serving up maple syrup in delicious and unexpected ways
By The Week US Published
-
Music Reviews: Mdou Moctar, Panda Bear, and Tate McRae
Feature “Tears of Injustice,” “Sinister Grift,” and “So Close to What”
By The Week US Published
-
What's at stake in the Mahmoud Khalil deportation fight?
Talking Points Vague accusations and First Amendment concerns
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published