Doonesbury's 'graphic' abortion comic strips: 'Tasteless'?
Newspapers are split over whether to run controversial cartoons likening Texas' mandated pre-abortion ultrasounds to rape

Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau is no stranger to controversy, but he's stirring up one of the most tense debates of his long career this week with a series of strips on Texas' new law requiring women to get ultrasounds before having an abortion. In one of the strips (see it below), which some newspapers are refusing to run, a clinic employee tells a woman to "please take a seat in the shaming room." In another, a doctor about to conduct a vaginal ultrasound with a "10-inch shaming wand" tells a patient, "By the authority invested in me by the GOP base, I thee rape." A spokeswoman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who signed the law, called the strips "tasteless." Trudeau told The Washington Post that he had expected controversy, but that ignoring the issue "would have been comedy malpractice." Is it appropriate to mine such a sensitive issue for laughs?
Abortion is no laughing matter: Trudeau's riff on abortion laws "oversteps the boundaries of good taste," says Rick Green at the Des Moines Register. His language is "graphic" and "offensive" — and that's coming from a longtime Doonesbury fan. And no matter what you think of this abortion controversy, we should all be able to agree that it's utterly inappropriate to accuse Texas Republicans of a vast rape conspiracy in a comic "wedged beneath 'Family Circus' and 'Dennis the Menace.'"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Censoring Trudeau is what's really offensive: Any editors "getting hinky about the cartoons" can move them to their opinion pages, says Jessica Wakeman at The Frisky. "But refusing to run the comics at all based on their content amounts to censorship," and that's just wrong. These papers have probably published articles in which people called forced transvaginal ultrasounds "state-mandated rape." Trying to stifle Trudeau for expressing the same views is despicable.
"'Doonesbury' comics on abortion banned by newspapers"
The controversy only ensures more people will see the strips: The cartoons are "hard hitting," to be sure, says Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway. But by objecting so loudly, Trudeau's critics are only going to "bring more attention and publicity" to the very speech they're protesting against. Newspaper readership is in free-fall. If nobody had made a stink, these cartoons would have come and gone largely unnoticed. Now a lot more people will be offended — because a lot more people will look to see what all the fuss is about.
"Doonesbury strip on abortion arouses controversy"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Rikers Island will no longer be under New York City's control
The Explainer A 'remediation manager' has been appointed to run the infamous jail
-
California may pull health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise
-
Is Apple breaking up with Google?
Today's Big Question Google is the default search engine in the Safari browser. The emergence of artificial intelligence could change that.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy