2012 GOP race: Is the South irrelevant?

Dixie is rejecting frontrunner Mitt Romney, who may become the nominee in spite of the South, not because of it

On Super Tuesday, Newt Gingrich won Georgia and Rick Santorum cleaned up in Tennessee, leaving Mitt Romney without a true Southern prize.
(Image credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

With Super Tuesday behind them, the Republican presidential candidates are gearing up for potentially critical contests in Alabama and Mississippi on March 13. For decades, the rule of thumb for Republican hopefuls has been: You have to win the South to bag the party's nomination. But this year, national frontrunner Mitt Romney, who has roots in the Midwest and Northeast, has failed to connect with Southern voters. He even conceded that Tuesday's Deep South votes will be "a bit of an away game" for him. And yet, because of his string of wins elsewhere, Romney is the strong favorite to emerge as the GOP nominee. Has the South lost its influence?

The South has become "irrelevant": In election after election, the GOP nominee has "minted his crown in South Carolina," says David Weigel at Slate. But this year, the Palmetto State picked Newt Gingrich, who almost certainly won't be the nominee. Meanwhile, Romney — the almost certain nominee embraced by the GOP mainstream — hasn't come within 9 percent of winning a Southern state. You'd have to travel "far, far back in time to find another Republican primary where the South was this irrelevant."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up