Apple's new Mountain Lion OS: Where's Siri?

Sure, the newest Mac operating system is packed full of sleek new features to make it more "iPad-like." But noticeably absent is a popular, spunky voice assistant

Apple's voice-activated assistant debuted on the iPhone 4S, is rumored to be included on the next generation iPad, but is absent from the latest OS X update.
(Image credit: Lannis Waters/ZUMA Press/Corbis)

"Clearly, Siri is Apple's most celebrated user feature," says Christina Bonnington at Wired. So why is the famed virtual assistant missing from the latest OS X update, Mountain Lion? Released last week for developers, the operating system update introduced several key features to streamline the Mac's desktop software with its mobile platforms, effectively making your computer more "iPad-like." Apple, however, has declined, so far, to include the iPhone 4S's talking assistant in other products. But if Siri is supposed to be a "game changer," what's holding Apple back? Here, 4 theories:

1. There's a microphone problem

There are several technical obstacles to getting Siri's voice-activated interface to work on a MacBook or iMac. "The iPhone is designed to be held up to your face," says Wired's Bonnington, and the 4S comes equipped with noise reduction technology in its microphone to make sure your voice registers clearly (and even then, Siri can mangle your instructions). But the built-in mic on your computer "doesn't offer the same voice-processing sensitivity" — at least not yet.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

2. Siri would annoy your coworkers

The advantages a voice-powered assistant offers "are stronger on a small mobile device," software developer William Tunstall-Pedoe tells Wired (his company created a Siri-like clone called Evi). On a PC, you already have a much larger interface with a keyboard and mouse, so why issue commands with your mouth? Plus, "PCs are also often used in environments where the use of voice would be awkward" — like in a quiet open office, for instance.

3. A desktop Siri isn't ready for developers yet

It's a "curious thing" that Apple neglected to include Siri with Mountain Lion, especially since it's tied to a number of apps, including Notes, Reminders, and Messages, says Josh Lowensohn at CNET. One reason could be that Siri simply doesn't have a place on the desktop yet, but that's not really an excuse. The more "probable" answer is that Apple simply doesn't want to introduce voice-recognition to a desktop OS "without a way for developers to tap into it," as app developers are crucial to Apple's success.

4. Siri isn't as powerful as Google

Siri is great for doing short tasks like sending text messages or taking down notes. But it has more limited capabilities than robust search engines, says Bonnington. "Why would you have Siri look something up when you can more quickly run your own Google search?" But consider the possibilities of having advanced voice commands on your iMac, says Lex Friedman at Macworld. "Queries about the weather or stocks should work, and could probably surface the related dashboard widget we all know, love, and never visit." With a few tweaks, Apple could port Siri over to desktops. And based on speech-to-text dictation alone, "Siri on the Mac would be a huge accessibility win," says John Gruber at Daring Fireball. Let's hope Apple changes its thinking. And soon.

Sources: Wired, CNET, Macworld, Daring Fireball