Why GOP voters are turning on Newt: 5 theories
With just two weeks to go before the critical Iowa caucuses, the self-assured former House speaker is sinking in the polls. What went wrong?
"The bad news keeps piling up for Newt Gingrich," says Amanda Paulson in The Christian Science Monitor. His double-digit lead in several national and Iowa-specific polls has evaporated, putting him neck-and-neck with Mitt Romney or, in one new PPP poll of Iowa, behind both Romney and Ron Paul. That PPP poll also has Gingrich's net favorability rating plummeting from +31 two weeks ago to -1 now. Many political junkies had thought Newt's rise to frontrunner status would be more permanent than the short-lived boomlets enjoyed by Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, and Herman Cain. Why has Gingrich fallen so hard, so fast? Here, five theories:
1. Gingrich was buried under negative ads
The Gingrich campaign is pushing back against an onslaught of TV and radio ads attacking him in Iowa, but the former House speaker's new $242,000 ad buy may be too little, too late. Ron Paul has been hammering Newt for weeks as a phony conservative, and a pro-Romney super PAC has been outspending Gingrich 34 to 1. "The Romney-Paul onslaught is clearly generating a lot of heat, and Gingrich's waxen wings are melting underneath it," says Adam Sorensen at TIME. When you talk to Iowa's caucus-goers, you hear distinct echoes of the ads, says David Weigel at Slate. That proves the attacks are working.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. GOP voters remembered Newt's many flaws
Many members of the media and the Republican establishment assumed that because they remember Gingrich's many vices, everyone else did, too, and accepted Newt anyway. Wrong, says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. Many GOP voters needed a "refresher course in his erratic leadership, his bizarre schemes, and his ethics deficiencies." But once they got it, "the bloom came off the rose." For all the right-wing blog and "talk-radio-show set screams" about the GOP "elites" vs. the base, once Newt's faults "trickled down" to voters, "the base essentially came to agree with those 'elites.'"
3. Newt's attack on the judiciary backfired
Facing a hostile GOP establishment, Gingrich "apparently decided to make a radical, constitutionally dubious assault on federal judges — a favorite right-wing punching bag for decades — the centerpiece of his message," says Steve Kornacki at Salon. But that has only reinforced "whatever doubts rank-and-file Republicans have about his maturity, stability, and electability." Attacking "the only branch of government that enjoys almost 50 percent popular support" is a real head-scratcher, especially given the federal judiciary's recent conservative bent, says Dahlia Lithwick at Slate. It's "a distinct possibility that Newt, the big ideas man, never fully appreciated that the 'war on activist judges' is a talking point, not a position paper."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. Republicans simply don't trust him
In the end, this wild boom-and-bust GOP primary race has been "a search for trust," says TIME's Sorensen. Already "tarred by a sketchy past," Gingrich's "brazenness" as the frontrunner has only eroded voters' confidence that he wouldn't "mess up what should be a favorable election year" for the GOP. That's why Romney's charge that Gingrich is too "zany" for primetime stings so badly. "Republicans voters trust that Romney can beat Obama," and even though they "hardly trust anything else about him," that might be enough for Mitt to seal the deal.
5. It's just Newt's time to crash and burn
Why is anyone surprised at Gingrich's "swift and sudden rise, followed by a sudden fall"? asks Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway. The real shocker would have been if he hadn't "followed the same path as all the other contenders that have arisen since this race started in earnest in August." Having failed to raise money or do anything else you need to do to actually run for president, "Newt's only chance was to catch his wave with less than a week before Iowa," says Noam Scheiber at The New Republic. "Anything else just wasn't going to work for him. And it didn't." He peaked too soon, and couldn't hit back when "the inevitable hazing came."
-
Film reviews: 'Wicked: For Good' and 'Rental Family'Feature Glinda the Good is forced to choose sides and an actor takes work filling holes in strangers' lives
-
‘Like a gas chamber’: the air pollution throttling DelhiUnder The Radar Indian capital has tried cloud seeding to address the crisis, which has seen schools closed and outdoor events suspended
-
Political cartoons for November 23Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include a Thanksgiving horn of plenty, the naughty list, and more
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration